Towards an automatic real-time assessment of online discussions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning practices

S. Caballé, F. Xhafa, A. Abraham
{"title":"Towards an automatic real-time assessment of online discussions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning practices","authors":"S. Caballé, F. Xhafa, A. Abraham","doi":"10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The discussion process plays an important social task in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) where participants can discuss about the activity being performed, collaborate with each other through the exchange of ideas that may arise, propose new resolution mechanisms, and justify and refine their own contributions, and as a result acquire new knowledge. Indeed, learning by discussion when applied to collaborative learning scenarios can provide significant benefits for students in collaborative learning, and in education in general. As a result, current educational organizations incorporate in-class online discussions into web-based courses as part of the very rationale of their pedagogical models. However, online discussions as collaborative learning activities are usually greatly participated and contributed, which makes the monitoring and assessment tasks time-consuming, tedious and error-prone. Specially hard if not impossible by humans is to manually deal with the sequences of hundreds of contributions making up the discussion threads and the relations between these contributions. As a result, current assessment in online discussions restricts to offer evaluation results of the content quality of contributions after the completion of the collaborative learning task and neglects the essential issue of constantly assessing the knowledge building as a whole while it is still being generated. In this paper, we propose a multidimensional model based on data analysis from online collaborative discussion interaction that provides a first step towards an automatic assessment in (almost) real time. The context of this study is a real on-line discussion experience that took place at the Open University of Catalonia.","PeriodicalId":415013,"journal":{"name":"2008 Third International Conference on Digital Information Management","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Third International Conference on Digital Information Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDIM.2008.4746758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The discussion process plays an important social task in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) where participants can discuss about the activity being performed, collaborate with each other through the exchange of ideas that may arise, propose new resolution mechanisms, and justify and refine their own contributions, and as a result acquire new knowledge. Indeed, learning by discussion when applied to collaborative learning scenarios can provide significant benefits for students in collaborative learning, and in education in general. As a result, current educational organizations incorporate in-class online discussions into web-based courses as part of the very rationale of their pedagogical models. However, online discussions as collaborative learning activities are usually greatly participated and contributed, which makes the monitoring and assessment tasks time-consuming, tedious and error-prone. Specially hard if not impossible by humans is to manually deal with the sequences of hundreds of contributions making up the discussion threads and the relations between these contributions. As a result, current assessment in online discussions restricts to offer evaluation results of the content quality of contributions after the completion of the collaborative learning task and neglects the essential issue of constantly assessing the knowledge building as a whole while it is still being generated. In this paper, we propose a multidimensional model based on data analysis from online collaborative discussion interaction that provides a first step towards an automatic assessment in (almost) real time. The context of this study is a real on-line discussion experience that took place at the Open University of Catalonia.
计算机支持的协作学习实践中在线讨论的自动实时评估
讨论过程在计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)中扮演着重要的社会任务,参与者可以讨论正在进行的活动,通过交换可能出现的想法而相互协作,提出新的解决机制,并证明和完善自己的贡献,从而获得新知识。事实上,通过讨论学习当应用于协作学习场景时,可以为学生在协作学习和一般教育中提供显著的好处。因此,当前的教育机构将课堂上的在线讨论纳入到基于网络的课程中,作为其教学模式的基本原理的一部分。然而,在线讨论作为一种协作学习活动,通常参与和贡献较多,这使得监测和评估任务耗时、繁琐且容易出错。特别困难的是,如果不是不可能的话,人工处理组成讨论线程的数百个贡献的序列以及这些贡献之间的关系。因此,目前在线讨论中的评估局限于在协作学习任务完成后提供对贡献内容质量的评估结果,而忽略了在知识构建仍在产生时对其进行整体持续评估的本质问题。在本文中,我们提出了一个基于在线协作讨论交互数据分析的多维模型,为(几乎)实时的自动评估提供了第一步。这项研究的背景是一个真实的在线讨论的经验,发生在加泰罗尼亚开放大学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信