Cloud Security Risk Management: A Critical Review

Temesgen Kitaw Damenu, C. Balakrishna
{"title":"Cloud Security Risk Management: A Critical Review","authors":"Temesgen Kitaw Damenu, C. Balakrishna","doi":"10.1109/NGMAST.2015.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cloud computing has created a remarkable paradigm shift in the IT industry and brought several advantages such as on-demand self-service, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity, and measured service. These advantages enabled cloud to have significant impact on different sectors of smart cites. However, cloud adoption has increased the sophistication of the ever changing security risks which frustrate enterprises on expanding their on-premises infrastructure towards cloud horizons. These risks have the potential of being a major concern for smart cities due to the increasing impact of cloud on them. Managing these security risks requires adopting effective risk management method which involve both the cloud service provider and the customer. The risk management frameworks currently applied to manage enterprise IT risks do not readily fit the cloud environment and the dynamic nature of clouds, which are characterized by on demand self-service and rapid elasticity. Therefore, researchers have proposed different cloud security risk management methods and frameworks. This paper critically reviews these risk management methods and frameworks. In addition, it conducts critical analysis on two of them using qualitative content analysis technique, and evaluates their effectiveness for assessing and mitigating cloud security risks.","PeriodicalId":217588,"journal":{"name":"2015 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 9th International Conference on Next Generation Mobile Applications, Services and Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NGMAST.2015.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Cloud computing has created a remarkable paradigm shift in the IT industry and brought several advantages such as on-demand self-service, broad network access, resource pooling, rapid elasticity, and measured service. These advantages enabled cloud to have significant impact on different sectors of smart cites. However, cloud adoption has increased the sophistication of the ever changing security risks which frustrate enterprises on expanding their on-premises infrastructure towards cloud horizons. These risks have the potential of being a major concern for smart cities due to the increasing impact of cloud on them. Managing these security risks requires adopting effective risk management method which involve both the cloud service provider and the customer. The risk management frameworks currently applied to manage enterprise IT risks do not readily fit the cloud environment and the dynamic nature of clouds, which are characterized by on demand self-service and rapid elasticity. Therefore, researchers have proposed different cloud security risk management methods and frameworks. This paper critically reviews these risk management methods and frameworks. In addition, it conducts critical analysis on two of them using qualitative content analysis technique, and evaluates their effectiveness for assessing and mitigating cloud security risks.
云安全风险管理:一个关键的审查
云计算在IT行业中创造了一个显著的范式转变,并带来了一些优势,如按需自助服务、广泛的网络访问、资源池、快速弹性和可测量的服务。这些优势使云对智慧城市的不同领域产生重大影响。然而,云的采用增加了不断变化的安全风险的复杂性,这些风险阻碍了企业向云地平线扩展其内部部署基础设施。由于云计算对智能城市的影响越来越大,这些风险有可能成为智能城市的主要关注点。管理这些安全风险需要采用有效的风险管理方法,这涉及到云服务提供商和客户。目前用于管理企业IT风险的风险管理框架并不容易适应云环境和云的动态性,云的特点是随需服务和快速弹性。因此,研究人员提出了不同的云安全风险管理方法和框架。本文批判性地回顾了这些风险管理方法和框架。此外,采用定性内容分析技术对其中两个进行了批判性分析,并评估了其在评估和缓解云安全风险方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信