Leadership: The Art of Empowering Others

J. Conger
{"title":"Leadership: The Art of Empowering Others","authors":"J. Conger","doi":"10.5465/AME.1989.4277145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I n his handbook, The Prince, Machiavelli assures his readers some being aspiring leaders, no doubt that only by carefully amassing power and building a fearsome respect could one become a great leader. While the shadowy court life of 16th-century Italy demanded such treachery to ensure one's power, it seems hard to imagine Machiavelli's advice today as anything but a historical curiosity. Yet, interestingly, much of the management literature has focused on the strategies and tactics that managers can use to increase their own power and influence.' As such, a Machiavellian quality often pervades the literature, encouraging managers to ensure that their power base is strong and growing. At the same time a small but increasing number of management theorists have begun to explore the idea that organizational effectiveness also depends on the sharing of power that the distribution of power is more important than the hoarding of power.2 While the idea of making others feel more powerful contradicts the stereotype of the all-powerful executive, research suggests that the traditional ways of explaining a leader's influence may not be entirely correct. For example, recent leadership studies argue that the practice of empowering or instilling a sense of power is at the root of organizational effectiveness, especially during times of transition and transformation.3 In addition, studies of power and control within organizations indicate that the more productive forms of organizational power increase with superiors' sharing of power and responsibility with subordinates.4 And while there is an increasing awareness of this need for more empowering leadership, we have only recently started to see documentation about the actual practices that leaders employ to effectively build a sense of power among organizational members as well as the contexts most suited for empowerment practices.5 In this article, I will explore these practices further by drawing upon a recent study of senior executives who proved themselves highly effective leaders. They were selected by a panel of professors at the Harvard Business School and management consultants who were well acquainted with them and their companies. The study included eight chief executive officers and executive vice-presidents of Fortune 500 companies and successful entrepreneurial firms, representing industries as diverse as telecommunications, office automation, retail banking, beverages, packaged foods, and managementconsulting. In each case, these individuals were responsible for either the creation of highly successful companies or for performing what were described as remarkable turnarounds. During my study of these executives, I conducted extensive interviews, observed them on the job, read company and other documents, and talked with their colleagues and subordinates. While the study focused on the broader issue of leadership styles, intensive interviews with these executives and their subordinates revealed that many were characterized as empowering leaders. Their actions were perceived as building confidence and restoring a sense of personal power and self-efficacy during difficult organizational transitions. From this study, I identified certain organizational contexts of powerlessness and management practices derived to remedy them. In this article I will also illustrate several of these practices through a series of vignettes. While the reader may recognize some of the basic ideas behind these practices (such as providing greater opportunities for initiative), it is often the creative manner in which the leader deploys the particular practice that distinguishes them. The reader will discover how they have been carefully tailored to fit the context at hand. I might add, however, that these practices represent just a few of the broad repertoire of actions that leaders can take to make an empowering difference in their organizations.","PeriodicalId":337734,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Executive","volume":"99 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"292","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Executive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1989.4277145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 292

Abstract

I n his handbook, The Prince, Machiavelli assures his readers some being aspiring leaders, no doubt that only by carefully amassing power and building a fearsome respect could one become a great leader. While the shadowy court life of 16th-century Italy demanded such treachery to ensure one's power, it seems hard to imagine Machiavelli's advice today as anything but a historical curiosity. Yet, interestingly, much of the management literature has focused on the strategies and tactics that managers can use to increase their own power and influence.' As such, a Machiavellian quality often pervades the literature, encouraging managers to ensure that their power base is strong and growing. At the same time a small but increasing number of management theorists have begun to explore the idea that organizational effectiveness also depends on the sharing of power that the distribution of power is more important than the hoarding of power.2 While the idea of making others feel more powerful contradicts the stereotype of the all-powerful executive, research suggests that the traditional ways of explaining a leader's influence may not be entirely correct. For example, recent leadership studies argue that the practice of empowering or instilling a sense of power is at the root of organizational effectiveness, especially during times of transition and transformation.3 In addition, studies of power and control within organizations indicate that the more productive forms of organizational power increase with superiors' sharing of power and responsibility with subordinates.4 And while there is an increasing awareness of this need for more empowering leadership, we have only recently started to see documentation about the actual practices that leaders employ to effectively build a sense of power among organizational members as well as the contexts most suited for empowerment practices.5 In this article, I will explore these practices further by drawing upon a recent study of senior executives who proved themselves highly effective leaders. They were selected by a panel of professors at the Harvard Business School and management consultants who were well acquainted with them and their companies. The study included eight chief executive officers and executive vice-presidents of Fortune 500 companies and successful entrepreneurial firms, representing industries as diverse as telecommunications, office automation, retail banking, beverages, packaged foods, and managementconsulting. In each case, these individuals were responsible for either the creation of highly successful companies or for performing what were described as remarkable turnarounds. During my study of these executives, I conducted extensive interviews, observed them on the job, read company and other documents, and talked with their colleagues and subordinates. While the study focused on the broader issue of leadership styles, intensive interviews with these executives and their subordinates revealed that many were characterized as empowering leaders. Their actions were perceived as building confidence and restoring a sense of personal power and self-efficacy during difficult organizational transitions. From this study, I identified certain organizational contexts of powerlessness and management practices derived to remedy them. In this article I will also illustrate several of these practices through a series of vignettes. While the reader may recognize some of the basic ideas behind these practices (such as providing greater opportunities for initiative), it is often the creative manner in which the leader deploys the particular practice that distinguishes them. The reader will discover how they have been carefully tailored to fit the context at hand. I might add, however, that these practices represent just a few of the broad repertoire of actions that leaders can take to make an empowering difference in their organizations.
《领导:赋予他人权力的艺术
在他的手册《君主论》中,马基雅维利向他的读者保证,有些人是有抱负的领导者,毫无疑问,只有小心翼翼地积累权力,建立令人敬畏的尊重,才能成为伟大的领导者。虽然16世纪意大利阴暗的宫廷生活需要这样的背叛来确保自己的权力,但马基雅维利的建议在今天似乎很难想象会成为历史上的珍品。然而,有趣的是,很多管理学文献关注的是管理者可以用来增加自己权力和影响力的战略和战术。”因此,一种马基雅维利式的品质经常弥漫在文献中,鼓励管理者确保他们的权力基础强大且不断增长。与此同时,越来越多的管理理论家开始探讨组织的有效性也取决于权力的分享,即权力的分配比权力的囤积更重要虽然让别人觉得自己更强大的想法与人们对全能高管的刻板印象相矛盾,但研究表明,解释领导者影响力的传统方法可能并不完全正确。例如,最近的领导力研究认为,授权或灌输权力意识的做法是组织效率的根源,特别是在过渡和转型时期此外,对组织内部权力和控制的研究表明,随着上级与下属分享权力和责任,更富有成效的组织权力形式也会增加虽然越来越多的人意识到需要更多的授权领导,但我们直到最近才开始看到关于领导者在组织成员中有效地建立权力感的实际实践的文档,以及最适合授权实践的背景在本文中,我将通过引用最近对证明自己是高效领导者的高级管理人员的研究,进一步探讨这些实践。他们是由哈佛商学院(Harvard Business School)的教授和管理顾问组成的评委会选出的,这些人对他们和他们的公司都很熟悉。这项研究包括了财富500强公司和成功创业公司的8位首席执行官和执行副总裁,他们代表了电信、办公自动化、零售银行、饮料、包装食品和管理咨询等不同行业。在每个案例中,这些人要么负责创建非常成功的公司,要么负责执行被称为卓越的转变。在我对这些高管的研究中,我进行了广泛的访谈,观察他们的工作,阅读公司和其他文件,并与他们的同事和下属交谈。虽然这项研究关注的是更广泛的领导风格问题,但对这些高管及其下属的深入采访显示,他们中的许多人都被定性为授权型领导。他们的行为被认为是在艰难的组织转型过程中建立信心,恢复个人权力和自我效能感。从这项研究中,我确定了某些组织背景下的无力感和管理实践,以补救它们。在本文中,我还将通过一系列插图来说明其中的一些实践。虽然读者可能会认识到这些实践背后的一些基本思想(比如为主动性提供更多的机会),但通常是领导者部署特定实践的创造性方式将其区分开来。读者会发现它们是如何被精心剪裁以适应当前的语境的。然而,我想补充一点,这些做法只是领导者可以采取的一系列行动中的一小部分,这些行动可以在他们的组织中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信