Comparing Single-locking and Double-locking Plate Fixation Methods in Patients With Proximal Tibial Fractures

S. Ghaffari, Mehran Razavipour, Masoud Sheyesteazar, S. Talebi, Iman Sadeghian, Alireza Kazemi
{"title":"Comparing Single-locking and Double-locking Plate Fixation Methods in Patients With Proximal Tibial Fractures","authors":"S. Ghaffari, Mehran Razavipour, Masoud Sheyesteazar, S. Talebi, Iman Sadeghian, Alireza Kazemi","doi":"10.32598/jrosj.8.4.751.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Proximal tibial fractures account for 1% of all fractures. Different treatments have been proposed for this fracture. Objectives: The present study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of single-locking and double-locking plate fixation methods in patients with proximal tibial fractures. Methods: The present study was carried out on 40 patients with proximal tibial fractures referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari, Iran. They were divided into two groups of double-locking fixation with 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP) and single-locking fixation with 4.5-mm LCP. They were followed up for at least 6 months after surgery. At the time of admission, they were assessed using Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and Visual Analogue Scale. Radiographs were taken from all patients and the articular surface, and fracture healing,. Results: Of 40 patients, 17 and 23 were treated with 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm LCPs, respectively. The mean Lysholm score in the groups with 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm LCPs was 84±8.2 and 78.3±16.2, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.5). Conclusion: The radiological and functional outcomes were almost the same for single-locking and double-locking plate fixation methods. Both methods can be used to treat the tibial plateau fracture. The treatment can be selected according to the surgeon and the patient’s request","PeriodicalId":429963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Orthopedic Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/jrosj.8.4.751.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Proximal tibial fractures account for 1% of all fractures. Different treatments have been proposed for this fracture. Objectives: The present study aims to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of single-locking and double-locking plate fixation methods in patients with proximal tibial fractures. Methods: The present study was carried out on 40 patients with proximal tibial fractures referred to Imam Khomeini Hospital in Sari, Iran. They were divided into two groups of double-locking fixation with 3.5-mm Locking Compression Plate (LCP) and single-locking fixation with 4.5-mm LCP. They were followed up for at least 6 months after surgery. At the time of admission, they were assessed using Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale and Visual Analogue Scale. Radiographs were taken from all patients and the articular surface, and fracture healing,. Results: Of 40 patients, 17 and 23 were treated with 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm LCPs, respectively. The mean Lysholm score in the groups with 3.5-mm and 4.5-mm LCPs was 84±8.2 and 78.3±16.2, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.5). Conclusion: The radiological and functional outcomes were almost the same for single-locking and double-locking plate fixation methods. Both methods can be used to treat the tibial plateau fracture. The treatment can be selected according to the surgeon and the patient’s request
胫骨近端骨折单锁定与双锁定钢板固定方法的比较
背景:胫骨近端骨折占所有骨折的1%。对于这种骨折已经提出了不同的治疗方法。目的:本研究旨在评价单锁定和双锁定钢板固定治疗胫骨近端骨折的临床和影像学结果。方法:本研究对伊朗萨里伊玛目霍梅尼医院的40例胫骨近端骨折患者进行了研究。患者分为3.5 mm锁定加压板(LCP)双锁固定组和4.5 mm锁定加压板单锁固定组。术后随访至少6个月。入院时,采用Lysholm膝关节评分量表和视觉模拟量表对患者进行评估。所有患者均拍摄关节面x线片,观察骨折愈合情况。结果:40例患者中,分别有17例和23例采用3.5 mm和4.5 mm LCPs治疗。3.5 mm和4.5 mm LCPs组Lysholm平均评分分别为84±8.2和78.3±16.2。两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.5)。结论:单锁定和双锁定钢板固定的放射学和功能效果几乎相同。两种方法均可用于治疗胫骨平台骨折。可以根据外科医生和病人的要求选择治疗方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信