Artificial Swarms find Social Optima : (Late Breaking Report)

Louis B. Rosenberg, G. Willcox
{"title":"Artificial Swarms find Social Optima : (Late Breaking Report)","authors":"Louis B. Rosenberg, G. Willcox","doi":"10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"in the natural world, many social species amplify their collective intelligence by forming real-time closed-loop systems. Referred to as Swarm Intelligence (SI), this phenomenon has been rigorously studied in schools of fish, flocks of birds, and swarms of bees. In recent years, technology has enabled human groups to form real-time closed-loop systems modeled after natural swarms and moderated by AI algorithms. Referred to as Artificial Swarm Intelligence (ASI), these methods have been shown to enable human groups to reach optimized decisions. The present research explores this further, testing if ASI enables groups with conflicting views to converge on socially optimal solutions. Results showed that “swarming” was significantly more effective at enabling groups to converge on the Social Optima than three common voting methods: (i) Plurality voting (i) Borda Count and (iii) Condorcet pairwise voting. While traditional voting methods converged on socially optimal solutions with 60% success across a test set of 100 questions, the ASI system converged on socially optimal solutions with 82% success (p<0.001).","PeriodicalId":231353,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Conference on Cognitive and Computational Aspects of Situation Management (CogSIMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/COGSIMA.2018.8423987","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

in the natural world, many social species amplify their collective intelligence by forming real-time closed-loop systems. Referred to as Swarm Intelligence (SI), this phenomenon has been rigorously studied in schools of fish, flocks of birds, and swarms of bees. In recent years, technology has enabled human groups to form real-time closed-loop systems modeled after natural swarms and moderated by AI algorithms. Referred to as Artificial Swarm Intelligence (ASI), these methods have been shown to enable human groups to reach optimized decisions. The present research explores this further, testing if ASI enables groups with conflicting views to converge on socially optimal solutions. Results showed that “swarming” was significantly more effective at enabling groups to converge on the Social Optima than three common voting methods: (i) Plurality voting (i) Borda Count and (iii) Condorcet pairwise voting. While traditional voting methods converged on socially optimal solutions with 60% success across a test set of 100 questions, the ASI system converged on socially optimal solutions with 82% success (p<0.001).
人工蜂群找到社会最优点:(最新报道)
在自然界中,许多群居物种通过形成实时闭环系统来扩大它们的集体智慧。这种现象被称为群体智能(SI),已经在鱼群、鸟群和蜂群中得到了严格的研究。近年来,技术使人类群体能够形成以自然群体为模型、由人工智能算法调节的实时闭环系统。这些方法被称为人工群体智能(ASI),已被证明能够使人类群体达成优化决策。目前的研究进一步探讨了这一点,测试了ASI是否能够使具有冲突观点的群体收敛于社会最优解决方案。结果表明,“蜂群”比三种常见的投票方法(i)多数投票(i) Borda计数和(iii)孔多塞成对投票)在使群体收敛于社会最优方面显着更有效。传统的投票方法在100个问题的测试集中以60%的成功率收敛于社会最优解决方案,而ASI系统以82%的成功率收敛于社会最优解决方案(p<0.001)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信