On the Limitations of Logic Locking the Approximate Circuits

Kartik Nayak, Devanshi Upadhyaya, F. Regazzoni, I. Polian
{"title":"On the Limitations of Logic Locking the Approximate Circuits","authors":"Kartik Nayak, Devanshi Upadhyaya, F. Regazzoni, I. Polian","doi":"10.1109/AsianHOST56390.2022.10022175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Approximate Computing (AxC) is an emerging architectural paradigm, which promises improvements in area, performance or power consumption at the expense of limited and tolerable inaccuracies of computations. Circuits designed in typical AxC-friendly applications, such as neural network accelerators, visual computing and high-bandwidth communication, are vulnerable to supply-chain attacks. In this paper, we investigate logic locking-a protective technique against counterfeiting and overbuilding-in the context of AxC arithmetic primitives. We discuss a threat model that can hinder the adoption of logic locking on AxC based ICs. We show that modern SAT-resilient locking techniques are unsuitable for approximate circuits because of the low output corruption problem. Moreover, we explore the resistance of logic locking against an attacker who managed to obtain a subset of the correct locking key's bits. We show that an incorrectly unlocked circuit can still produce acceptable results, experimentally verifying this both at the level of primitives (adders and multipliers) and in a full application (neural network inference with approximate multiply-accumulate units).","PeriodicalId":207435,"journal":{"name":"2022 Asian Hardware Oriented Security and Trust Symposium (AsianHOST)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 Asian Hardware Oriented Security and Trust Symposium (AsianHOST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AsianHOST56390.2022.10022175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Approximate Computing (AxC) is an emerging architectural paradigm, which promises improvements in area, performance or power consumption at the expense of limited and tolerable inaccuracies of computations. Circuits designed in typical AxC-friendly applications, such as neural network accelerators, visual computing and high-bandwidth communication, are vulnerable to supply-chain attacks. In this paper, we investigate logic locking-a protective technique against counterfeiting and overbuilding-in the context of AxC arithmetic primitives. We discuss a threat model that can hinder the adoption of logic locking on AxC based ICs. We show that modern SAT-resilient locking techniques are unsuitable for approximate circuits because of the low output corruption problem. Moreover, we explore the resistance of logic locking against an attacker who managed to obtain a subset of the correct locking key's bits. We show that an incorrectly unlocked circuit can still produce acceptable results, experimentally verifying this both at the level of primitives (adders and multipliers) and in a full application (neural network inference with approximate multiply-accumulate units).
论近似电路逻辑锁定的局限性
近似计算(AxC)是一种新兴的架构范例,它承诺以有限的和可容忍的计算误差为代价来改进面积、性能或功耗。在典型的axc友好型应用中设计的电路,如神经网络加速器、视觉计算和高带宽通信,很容易受到供应链攻击。在本文中,我们研究了AxC算术原语环境下的逻辑锁定——一种防止伪造和过度构造的保护技术。我们讨论了一种可能阻碍在基于AxC的ic上采用逻辑锁定的威胁模型。我们表明,由于低输出损坏问题,现代卫星弹性锁定技术不适合近似电路。此外,我们还探讨了逻辑锁定对攻击者的抵抗力,攻击者设法获得了正确锁定密钥位的子集。我们表明,不正确解锁的电路仍然可以产生可接受的结果,在原语(加法器和乘法器)和完整应用(具有近似乘累积单元的神经网络推理)的层面上进行实验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信