Reliability Predictions Using Model-Based Criticality-Associated Similarity Analysis

A. Jackson, T. Jackson, Allura B. Jackson, Kristella B. Jackson
{"title":"Reliability Predictions Using Model-Based Criticality-Associated Similarity Analysis","authors":"A. Jackson, T. Jackson, Allura B. Jackson, Kristella B. Jackson","doi":"10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153610","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we will describe a methodology called Model-Based Criticality-Associated Similarity Analysis (CASA). The CASA methodology was first introduced to the Reliability Engineering community nearly 20 years ago, at the 48th Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) in Seattle, WA [Ref. 1]. This methodology systematically develops a reliability prediction by applying the following empirical-based step-wise conjecture: The ratio of predicted to demonstrated reliability for a new product (i.e., a product that has never been placed in-service) is equal to the corresponding ratio for a similar in-service product that has both its predicted and demonstrated reliabilities adjusted to reflect all the failure and sneak modes, mechanisms, and root causes of the new product. The CASA methodology is practical and efficient when there is newly designed electronics equipment that is sufficiently similar to in-service electronics equipment that has a demonstrated reliability. The application of this methodology will result in a reliability prediction that is more precise than those obtained by using traditional reliability prediction methodologies. With that said, the prerequisite for successful application of the CASA methodology is availability of detailed design and operational/field data. This paper describes an example application of the CASA methodology, in the rapid development of a new and more technologically advanced product that is required to have higher operational reliability and lower cost per unit-function than the predecessor in-service product. Fault/Failure-based modeling can yield meaningful comparisons between the relative design reliability of a new product and the operational/field reliability of a similar inservice product. It can also be used to perform complex reliability assessment in less time. Quantifying design differences allows one to determine adjustment factors that can be applied to the field reliability of the in-service product to obtain a precise and repeatable prediction for the “expected” field reliability of the new product. Since no field or test data are available for a new product design, the characteristics data of a similar in-service product must be used to achieve a degree of confidence in the reliability prediction of the new product. This type of reliability prediction is of great value during the development of the new product’s design reliability features because CASA makes use of knowledge about the impact of fault/failure modes, mechanisms, and root causes that occurred in the field, but which may not be considered by the designers prior to product manufacture and delivery.","PeriodicalId":360096,"journal":{"name":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153610","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we will describe a methodology called Model-Based Criticality-Associated Similarity Analysis (CASA). The CASA methodology was first introduced to the Reliability Engineering community nearly 20 years ago, at the 48th Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS) in Seattle, WA [Ref. 1]. This methodology systematically develops a reliability prediction by applying the following empirical-based step-wise conjecture: The ratio of predicted to demonstrated reliability for a new product (i.e., a product that has never been placed in-service) is equal to the corresponding ratio for a similar in-service product that has both its predicted and demonstrated reliabilities adjusted to reflect all the failure and sneak modes, mechanisms, and root causes of the new product. The CASA methodology is practical and efficient when there is newly designed electronics equipment that is sufficiently similar to in-service electronics equipment that has a demonstrated reliability. The application of this methodology will result in a reliability prediction that is more precise than those obtained by using traditional reliability prediction methodologies. With that said, the prerequisite for successful application of the CASA methodology is availability of detailed design and operational/field data. This paper describes an example application of the CASA methodology, in the rapid development of a new and more technologically advanced product that is required to have higher operational reliability and lower cost per unit-function than the predecessor in-service product. Fault/Failure-based modeling can yield meaningful comparisons between the relative design reliability of a new product and the operational/field reliability of a similar inservice product. It can also be used to perform complex reliability assessment in less time. Quantifying design differences allows one to determine adjustment factors that can be applied to the field reliability of the in-service product to obtain a precise and repeatable prediction for the “expected” field reliability of the new product. Since no field or test data are available for a new product design, the characteristics data of a similar in-service product must be used to achieve a degree of confidence in the reliability prediction of the new product. This type of reliability prediction is of great value during the development of the new product’s design reliability features because CASA makes use of knowledge about the impact of fault/failure modes, mechanisms, and root causes that occurred in the field, but which may not be considered by the designers prior to product manufacture and delivery.
使用基于模型的临界相关相似性分析进行可靠性预测
在本文中,我们将描述一种称为基于模型的临界相关相似性分析(CASA)的方法。CASA方法是在近20年前在西雅图举行的第48届可靠性和可维护性研讨会(RAMS)上首次引入可靠性工程社区的[参考文献1]。该方法通过应用以下基于经验的逐步猜想系统地开发可靠性预测:新产品(即从未投入使用的产品)的预测可靠性与演示可靠性的比率等于对其预测和演示可靠性进行调整以反映新产品的所有故障和潜行模式,机制和根本原因的类似在役产品的相应比率。当新设计的电子设备与已证明可靠的现役电子设备足够相似时,CASA方法是实用和有效的。该方法的应用将得到比传统可靠性预测方法更精确的可靠性预测结果。话虽如此,CASA方法成功应用的先决条件是获得详细的设计和操作/现场数据。本文描述了CASA方法在快速开发一种技术更先进的新产品中的一个应用实例,这种新产品需要比以前在役产品具有更高的运行可靠性和更低的单位功能成本。基于故障/故障的建模可以在新产品的相对设计可靠性与类似在役产品的操作/现场可靠性之间产生有意义的比较。它还可以在更短的时间内完成复杂的可靠性评估。量化设计差异使人们能够确定可应用于在役产品现场可靠性的调整因素,从而获得对新产品“预期”现场可靠性的精确和可重复预测。由于没有现场或测试数据可用于新产品设计,因此必须使用类似在役产品的特性数据来实现对新产品可靠性预测的一定程度的信心。这种类型的可靠性预测在新产品设计可靠性特征的开发过程中具有很大的价值,因为CASA利用了有关现场发生的故障/故障模式、机制和根本原因的影响的知识,但这些知识在产品制造和交付之前可能没有被设计人员考虑到。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信