Evolving Role of PKI in Facilitating Trust

Vishwas T. Patil, R. Shyamasundar
{"title":"Evolving Role of PKI in Facilitating Trust","authors":"Vishwas T. Patil, R. Shyamasundar","doi":"10.1109/PKIA56009.2022.9952249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A digital certificate is by far the most widely used artifact to establish secure electronic communication over the Internet. It certifies to its user that the public key encapsulated in it is associated with the subject of the certificate. A Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) is responsible to create, store, distribute, and revoke digital certificates. To establish a secure communication channel two unfamiliar entities rely on a common certificate issuer (a part of PKI) that vouches for both entities' certificates - thus authenticating each other via public keys listed in each other's certificates. Therefore, PKIs act as a trusted third party for two previously unfamiliar entities. Certificates are static data structures, their revocation status must be checked before usage; this step inadvertently involves a PKI for every secure channel establishment - leading to privacy violations of relying parties. As PKIs act as trust anchors for their subjects, any inadvertent event or malfeasance in PKI setup breaches the trust relationship leading to identity theft. Alternative PKI trust models, like PGP and SPKI, have been proposed but with limited deployment. With several retrofitting amendments to the prevalent X.509 standard, the standard has been serving its core objective of entity authentication but with modern requirements of contextual authentication, it is falling short to accommodate the evolving requirements. With the advent of blockchain as a trust management protocol, the time has come to rethink flexible alternatives to PKI core functionality; keeping in mind the modern-day requirements of contextual authentication-cum-authorization, weighted trust anchors, privacy-preservation, usability, and cost-efficient key management. In this paper, we assess this technology's complementary role in modern-day evolving security requirements. We discuss the feasibility of re-engineering PKIs with the help of blockchains, and identity networks.","PeriodicalId":333935,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Public Key Infrastructure and its Applications (PKIA)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Conference on Public Key Infrastructure and its Applications (PKIA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PKIA56009.2022.9952249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A digital certificate is by far the most widely used artifact to establish secure electronic communication over the Internet. It certifies to its user that the public key encapsulated in it is associated with the subject of the certificate. A Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) is responsible to create, store, distribute, and revoke digital certificates. To establish a secure communication channel two unfamiliar entities rely on a common certificate issuer (a part of PKI) that vouches for both entities' certificates - thus authenticating each other via public keys listed in each other's certificates. Therefore, PKIs act as a trusted third party for two previously unfamiliar entities. Certificates are static data structures, their revocation status must be checked before usage; this step inadvertently involves a PKI for every secure channel establishment - leading to privacy violations of relying parties. As PKIs act as trust anchors for their subjects, any inadvertent event or malfeasance in PKI setup breaches the trust relationship leading to identity theft. Alternative PKI trust models, like PGP and SPKI, have been proposed but with limited deployment. With several retrofitting amendments to the prevalent X.509 standard, the standard has been serving its core objective of entity authentication but with modern requirements of contextual authentication, it is falling short to accommodate the evolving requirements. With the advent of blockchain as a trust management protocol, the time has come to rethink flexible alternatives to PKI core functionality; keeping in mind the modern-day requirements of contextual authentication-cum-authorization, weighted trust anchors, privacy-preservation, usability, and cost-efficient key management. In this paper, we assess this technology's complementary role in modern-day evolving security requirements. We discuss the feasibility of re-engineering PKIs with the help of blockchains, and identity networks.
PKI在促进信任方面不断发展的角色
数字证书是迄今为止在Internet上建立安全电子通信的最广泛使用的工件。它向其用户证明,封装在其中的公钥与证书的主题相关联。公钥基础设施(PKI)负责创建、存储、分发和撤销数字证书。为了建立一个安全的通信通道,两个不熟悉的实体依赖于一个共同的证书颁发者(PKI的一部分),该证书颁发者为两个实体的证书提供担保,从而通过彼此证书中列出的公钥对彼此进行身份验证。因此,pki充当了两个以前不熟悉的实体的可信第三方。证书是静态数据结构,使用前必须检查其撤销状态;此步骤无意中涉及到每个安全通道建立的PKI -导致依赖方的隐私侵犯。由于PKI是主体的信任锚点,因此PKI设置中的任何疏忽或渎职行为都会破坏信任关系,从而导致身份盗窃。已经提出了其他PKI信任模型,如PGP和SPKI,但部署有限。通过对流行的X.509标准进行几次修改,该标准一直在服务于实体身份验证的核心目标,但随着上下文身份验证的现代需求,它无法适应不断发展的需求。随着区块链作为信任管理协议的出现,是时候重新考虑PKI核心功能的灵活替代方案了;记住上下文身份验证和授权、加权信任锚、隐私保护、可用性和经济高效的密钥管理的现代需求。在本文中,我们评估了该技术在现代不断发展的安全需求中的补充作用。我们讨论了在区块链和身份网络的帮助下重新设计pki的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信