Birth Registration for Every Child by 2030: Are we on track? Review and Annotated Version of an Unhelpful UNICEF Publication

J. van der Straaten
{"title":"Birth Registration for Every Child by 2030: Are we on track? Review and Annotated Version of an Unhelpful UNICEF Publication","authors":"J. van der Straaten","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3657062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades UNICEF has been the most visible advocate of birth registration globally. In 2015 the world community launched the Sustainable Development Agenda, which includes targets to achieve a legal identity for all, including birth registration, and targets to achieve universal birth registration (targets 16.9, and 17.19.2(b) which also includes a target for death registration). In December 2019 UNICEF issued a brochure meant to provide the status of birth registration ‘today’, and the prospect for change along the journey to 2030. In this technical report we review the publication. We identify quite a number of problems with the brochure, as UNICEF coins it. We are disappointed by the veracity of the data used, and find its recommendations lacking an evidence-base. The global birth registration coverage estimate in the publication is imprecise, but also pertains to years ago. But the publication is also a blow to the collaboration that is expected from UN organisations and the World Bank Group. The Deputy Secretary General has corralled them together into the United Nations Legal Identity Taskforce, but that does not appear to work. This review includes an impression of how various important actors in the identity management field pull in different directions, while their track records do not reveal much if any success. This is tragic. The people pay for the United Nations (including the Bretton Woods organisations), to deliver results for the people. Resources are wasted while staff produces bland reports, travel, meet and talk. The identity management field shows that it is better left to the people.<br>","PeriodicalId":332923,"journal":{"name":"GeographyRN: Social Geography (Topic)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GeographyRN: Social Geography (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3657062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Over the past two decades UNICEF has been the most visible advocate of birth registration globally. In 2015 the world community launched the Sustainable Development Agenda, which includes targets to achieve a legal identity for all, including birth registration, and targets to achieve universal birth registration (targets 16.9, and 17.19.2(b) which also includes a target for death registration). In December 2019 UNICEF issued a brochure meant to provide the status of birth registration ‘today’, and the prospect for change along the journey to 2030. In this technical report we review the publication. We identify quite a number of problems with the brochure, as UNICEF coins it. We are disappointed by the veracity of the data used, and find its recommendations lacking an evidence-base. The global birth registration coverage estimate in the publication is imprecise, but also pertains to years ago. But the publication is also a blow to the collaboration that is expected from UN organisations and the World Bank Group. The Deputy Secretary General has corralled them together into the United Nations Legal Identity Taskforce, but that does not appear to work. This review includes an impression of how various important actors in the identity management field pull in different directions, while their track records do not reveal much if any success. This is tragic. The people pay for the United Nations (including the Bretton Woods organisations), to deliver results for the people. Resources are wasted while staff produces bland reports, travel, meet and talk. The identity management field shows that it is better left to the people.
到2030年实现每个儿童的出生登记:我们在正轨上吗?一份无益的儿童基金会出版物的审查和注释版
在过去的二十年里,联合国儿童基金会一直是全球出生登记最引人注目的倡导者。2015年,国际社会启动了《可持续发展议程》,其中包括实现所有人合法身份的具体目标,包括出生登记,以及实现普遍出生登记的具体目标(具体目标16.9和17.19.2(b),其中还包括死亡登记的具体目标)。2019年12月,联合国儿童基金会发布了一本小册子,旨在介绍“今天”的出生登记状况,以及到2030年的变化前景。在这份技术报告中,我们回顾了该出版物。我们在联合国儿童基金会编写的小册子中发现了许多问题。我们对所使用数据的真实性感到失望,并发现其建议缺乏证据基础。该出版物中对全球出生登记覆盖率的估计并不精确,但也适用于多年前。但是,该出版物也打击了人们对联合国组织和世界银行集团合作的期望。副秘书长将他们召集到联合国法律身份特别工作组,但这似乎并没有起作用。本文回顾了身份管理领域中不同的重要参与者是如何朝着不同的方向前进的,而他们的业绩记录并没有显示出多少成功。这是悲剧。人民付钱给联合国(包括布雷顿森林组织),让它为人民提供成果。员工们制作乏味的报告、旅行、会面和交谈,资源被浪费了。身份管理领域表明,它最好留给人民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信