Sector-Specific Shocks and the Expenditure Elasticity Channel During the COVID-19 Crisis

Ana Danieli, Jane Olmstead-Rumsey
{"title":"Sector-Specific Shocks and the Expenditure Elasticity Channel During the COVID-19 Crisis","authors":"Ana Danieli, Jane Olmstead-Rumsey","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3593514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 economic crisis differs from past recessions in terms of the sectors and occupations that are being hit first. In this paper we propose a model with sectoral and occupational heterogeneity and non-homothetic preferences over sectors. That is, households' consumption bundles depend on income and they cut consumption on high income-elastic sectors when labor income falls. We first document that contact intensive occupations are concentrated in just a few, high-income-elasticity sectors. By contrast, production/manufacturing occupations are distributed widely across sectors. We then compare a COVID-19 type shock affecting service sectors first to a more ``standard\" recession affecting manufacturing in our model calibrated to match the U.S. economy. Our main result is that the increase in labor income inequality in the COVID-19 recession is one and a half times the increase in a normal recession due to the fact that contact intensive service workers are low income and work mainly in high income-elasticity sectors.","PeriodicalId":104577,"journal":{"name":"HEN: Labor & Workforce (RN","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HEN: Labor & Workforce (RN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3593514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

The COVID-19 economic crisis differs from past recessions in terms of the sectors and occupations that are being hit first. In this paper we propose a model with sectoral and occupational heterogeneity and non-homothetic preferences over sectors. That is, households' consumption bundles depend on income and they cut consumption on high income-elastic sectors when labor income falls. We first document that contact intensive occupations are concentrated in just a few, high-income-elasticity sectors. By contrast, production/manufacturing occupations are distributed widely across sectors. We then compare a COVID-19 type shock affecting service sectors first to a more ``standard" recession affecting manufacturing in our model calibrated to match the U.S. economy. Our main result is that the increase in labor income inequality in the COVID-19 recession is one and a half times the increase in a normal recession due to the fact that contact intensive service workers are low income and work mainly in high income-elasticity sectors.
2019冠状病毒病危机期间的部门冲击和支出弹性渠道
新冠肺炎经济危机与以往经济衰退的不同之处在于,首当其冲的是哪些行业和职业。在本文中,我们提出了一个具有部门和职业异质性和非同质偏好的模型。也就是说,家庭的消费依赖于收入,当劳动收入下降时,他们会削减高收入弹性部门的消费。我们首先证明,接触密集型职业集中在少数几个高收入弹性部门。相比之下,生产/制造业职业在各个部门分布广泛。然后,我们将影响服务业的COVID-19型冲击与影响制造业的更“标准”的衰退进行比较,我们的模型经过校准,以匹配美国经济。我们的主要结果是,在COVID-19经济衰退中,劳动收入不平等的增加是正常经济衰退的1.5倍,这是因为接触密集型服务工人收入较低,主要在高收入弹性部门工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信