The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements

Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2021-06-30 DOI:10.33880/ejfm.2021100204

Cagla Ozdemir, C. Aypak, S. Gorpelioglu

{"title":"The Association of Metabolic Syndrome Components with Anthropometric Measurements","authors":"Cagla Ozdemir, C. Aypak, S. Gorpelioglu","doi":"10.33880/ejfm.2021100204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to research the association of metabolic syndrome components with anthropometric measurements like arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, which are applied rarely. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 292 patients in November-December 2019. The arm circumference, neck circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, and body mass index measurements of the patients were made. Glucose, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure measurements were also recorded. The association between metabolic syndrome components and anthropometric measurements was analyzed. Results: Metabolic syndrome is diagnosed in 32.8% of the participants. According to body mass index, 18.6% of the patients were normal, 34.2% were overweight, and 47.2% were obese. There was a significant difference between the patients with and without metabolic syndrome in terms of laboratory parameters, blood pressure values, and anthropometric measurements. In the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, optimal cut-off values for arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio were determined as 31.75 (AUC=0.703), 34.85 (AUC=0.763), 113.75 (AUC=0.757), 0.90 (AUC=0.701), 0.61 (AUC=0.769) for females while they were 35.75 (AUC=0.573), 39.75 (AUC=0.795), 111.5 (AUC=0.607), 0.96 (AUC=0.888), 0.61 (AUC=0.888) for males respectively. Conclusion: A significant correlation was detected between arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, and metabolic syndrome components. However, low-density lipoprotein was not correlated with neck circumference and high-density lipoprotein with waist-to-height ratio. Keywords: metabolic syndrome, anthropometric measurement, body mass index, obesity, lipid profile","PeriodicalId":436322,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33880/ejfm.2021100204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to research the association of metabolic syndrome components with anthropometric measurements like arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, which are applied rarely. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted with 292 patients in November-December 2019. The arm circumference, neck circumference, waist circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-to-height ratio, and body mass index measurements of the patients were made. Glucose, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, systolic, and diastolic blood pressure measurements were also recorded. The association between metabolic syndrome components and anthropometric measurements was analyzed. Results: Metabolic syndrome is diagnosed in 32.8% of the participants. According to body mass index, 18.6% of the patients were normal, 34.2% were overweight, and 47.2% were obese. There was a significant difference between the patients with and without metabolic syndrome in terms of laboratory parameters, blood pressure values, and anthropometric measurements. In the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome, optimal cut-off values for arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio were determined as 31.75 (AUC=0.703), 34.85 (AUC=0.763), 113.75 (AUC=0.757), 0.90 (AUC=0.701), 0.61 (AUC=0.769) for females while they were 35.75 (AUC=0.573), 39.75 (AUC=0.795), 111.5 (AUC=0.607), 0.96 (AUC=0.888), 0.61 (AUC=0.888) for males respectively. Conclusion: A significant correlation was detected between arm circumference, neck circumference, hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, and waist-to-height ratio, and metabolic syndrome components. However, low-density lipoprotein was not correlated with neck circumference and high-density lipoprotein with waist-to-height ratio. Keywords: metabolic syndrome, anthropometric measurement, body mass index, obesity, lipid profile

查看原文本刊更多论文

代谢综合征成分与人体测量的关系

目的:本研究旨在研究代谢综合征成分与臂围、颈围、臀围、腰臀比、腰高比等应用较少的人体测量指标的相关性。方法:于2019年11 - 12月对292例患者进行横断面研究。测量患者的臂围、颈围、腰围、臀围、腰臀比、腰高比、体质指数。葡萄糖、高密度脂蛋白、低密度脂蛋白、收缩压和舒张压测量也被记录下来。分析代谢综合征成分与人体测量值之间的关系。结果:32.8%的参与者被诊断为代谢综合征。体质指数正常18.6%，超重34.2%，肥胖47.2%。代谢综合征患者和非代谢综合征患者在实验室参数、血压值和人体测量值方面存在显著差异。在代谢综合征诊断中，女性的臂围、颈围、臀围、腰臀比、腰高比的最佳临界值分别为31.75 (AUC=0.703)、34.85 (AUC=0.763)、113.75 (AUC=0.757)、0.90 (AUC=0.701)、0.61 (AUC=0.769)，男性的最佳临界值分别为35.75 (AUC=0.573)、39.75 (AUC=0.795)、111.5 (AUC=0.607)、0.96 (AUC=0.888)、0.61 (AUC=0.888)。结论:臂围、颈围、臀围、腰臀比、腰高比与代谢综合征成分存在显著相关。低密度脂蛋白与颈围无相关性，高密度脂蛋白与腰高比无相关性。关键词:代谢综合征，人体测量，体重指数，肥胖，血脂

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Eurasian Journal of Family Medicine

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量