1. Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations

Arthur Zilversmit
{"title":"1. Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations","authors":"Arthur Zilversmit","doi":"10.1515/9780823295555-003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"i-iong before Alex Haley popularized the idea of \"roots,\" Ameri cans have been concerned with the search for ancestors. The attempt to answer the question, \"Who are we?\" has often been answered by another question, \"Where did we come from?\" Al though historians have been responsible for drafting answers to these questions, neither the questions nor the answers are exclu sively within the domain of historians. Popular culture has its own answers, and we have, in fact, often witnessed a real tension between popular history and professional history in answering vital questions about who we are and where we came from. In the 1960s, when race was an overriding concern, our search for self-definition through looking at our roots led to a heated controversy over the real meaning of Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was one in a series of American founding fathers, and his views on slavery and race might provide a guide for those troubled days. The popular view of Lincoln as the Great Emancipator could provide a source for an American commitment to racial justice. Yet, this picture could lead to an obvious question?if Lincoln pointed the way to racial justice, why, in over one hundred years,","PeriodicalId":404010,"journal":{"name":"For The Vast Future Also","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"For The Vast Future Also","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9780823295555-003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

i-iong before Alex Haley popularized the idea of "roots," Ameri cans have been concerned with the search for ancestors. The attempt to answer the question, "Who are we?" has often been answered by another question, "Where did we come from?" Al though historians have been responsible for drafting answers to these questions, neither the questions nor the answers are exclu sively within the domain of historians. Popular culture has its own answers, and we have, in fact, often witnessed a real tension between popular history and professional history in answering vital questions about who we are and where we came from. In the 1960s, when race was an overriding concern, our search for self-definition through looking at our roots led to a heated controversy over the real meaning of Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was one in a series of American founding fathers, and his views on slavery and race might provide a guide for those troubled days. The popular view of Lincoln as the Great Emancipator could provide a source for an American commitment to racial justice. Yet, this picture could lead to an obvious question?if Lincoln pointed the way to racial justice, why, in over one hundred years,
1. 林肯和种族问题:十年解读
早在亚历克斯·海利(Alex Haley)普及“根”这个概念之前,美国人就一直在关注寻找祖先。试图回答“我们是谁?”这个问题常常被另一个问题所回答:“我们从哪里来?”虽然历史学家一直负责起草这些问题的答案,但问题和答案都不完全属于历史学家的领域。流行文化有它自己的答案,事实上,我们经常看到流行历史和专业历史在回答关于我们是谁和我们来自哪里的重要问题上存在真正的紧张关系。在20世纪60年代,当种族是压倒一切的问题时,我们通过审视自己的根源来寻找自我定义,导致了对亚伯拉罕·林肯的真正含义的激烈争论。林肯是美国开国元勋之一,他对奴隶制和种族问题的看法可能为那些混乱的日子提供了指导。人们普遍认为林肯是伟大的解放者,这可能为美国对种族正义的承诺提供了一个来源。然而,这幅图可能会导致一个明显的问题?如果林肯为种族公正指明了道路,为什么在一百多年后,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信