The Relationship between EU Legal Order and Albanian Legal Order

M. Rukaj
{"title":"The Relationship between EU Legal Order and Albanian Legal Order","authors":"M. Rukaj","doi":"10.20534/EJHSS-16-3-109-112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an analysis of the interaction of Community law with the national law and in particular the ratio between Community Albanian law. Main purpose of this paper is to clarify the position of the international legal order and in particular that of the Community in the Albanian legal regulated by constitutional provisions. During the analysis of the interaction between the Community and the Albanian law a question arises in case of a conflictual confrontation between the two legal systems, which one will be applied? Such situation always occurs in the cases when a provision of EU law transfers the rights and imposes direct obligations to the citizens of the EU while the content of this provision collides with the rule of national law. To resolve such a situation, the Republic of Albania has held a definite stance: bigotry retains superiority of international versus national law, positioning it in the hierarchy of sources of law immediately after the Constitution of the Republic of Albania. It is clear that the Albanian constitution legislators have been aware of their European perspective and for this fact the EU law and its legal order can survive only if compliance and protection is guaranteed by two cornerstones: direct applicability of Community law and the advantage of Community law over national law. They are two fundamental principles of European law which guarantee the implementation of the uniform and priority of the right of the EU in all Member States.","PeriodicalId":358300,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Business, Administration, Law and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20534/EJHSS-16-3-109-112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is an analysis of the interaction of Community law with the national law and in particular the ratio between Community Albanian law. Main purpose of this paper is to clarify the position of the international legal order and in particular that of the Community in the Albanian legal regulated by constitutional provisions. During the analysis of the interaction between the Community and the Albanian law a question arises in case of a conflictual confrontation between the two legal systems, which one will be applied? Such situation always occurs in the cases when a provision of EU law transfers the rights and imposes direct obligations to the citizens of the EU while the content of this provision collides with the rule of national law. To resolve such a situation, the Republic of Albania has held a definite stance: bigotry retains superiority of international versus national law, positioning it in the hierarchy of sources of law immediately after the Constitution of the Republic of Albania. It is clear that the Albanian constitution legislators have been aware of their European perspective and for this fact the EU law and its legal order can survive only if compliance and protection is guaranteed by two cornerstones: direct applicability of Community law and the advantage of Community law over national law. They are two fundamental principles of European law which guarantee the implementation of the uniform and priority of the right of the EU in all Member States.
欧盟法律秩序与阿尔巴尼亚法律秩序的关系
本文分析了共同体法律与国家法律的相互作用,特别是共同体阿尔巴尼亚法律之间的比例。本文的主要目的是澄清国际法律秩序,特别是共同体在宪法规定的阿尔巴尼亚法律中的地位。在分析欧共体和阿尔巴尼亚法律之间的相互作用时,出现了一个问题,如果两种法律制度之间发生冲突,将适用哪一种?这种情况经常发生在欧盟法律规定将权利和直接义务转移给欧盟公民,而该规定的内容与国家法律规则发生冲突的情况下。为了解决这种情况,阿尔巴尼亚共和国采取了明确的立场:偏见保留了国际法相对于国内法的优越性,将其置于紧随阿尔巴尼亚共和国宪法之后的法律渊源的等级中。显然,阿尔巴尼亚宪法立法者已经意识到他们的欧洲观点,因此,欧盟法及其法律秩序只有在两个基石:共同体法的直接适用和共同体法优于国内法保证遵守和保护的情况下才能存在。它们是欧洲法律的两项基本原则,保证了欧盟权利在所有成员国的统一和优先性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信