The Effect of a Similar Strategy in The Rebuilding of Valuable Buildings

Basim Hasan Hashim Al-majidi, Ahmed Hashmi El-Eqapy, Saja Khalid ALqasi
{"title":"The Effect of a Similar Strategy in The Rebuilding of Valuable Buildings","authors":"Basim Hasan Hashim Al-majidi, Ahmed Hashmi El-Eqapy, Saja Khalid ALqasi","doi":"10.33261/JAARU.2021.28.1.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reconstruction of archaeological buildings with destroyed or collapsed parts is considered oneof the most important and accurate operations in the field of preserving those buildings, given the continuityof these operations in the continuity of those archaeological buildings with their architectural and technicaldetails, and even their continued performance in their urban environment in many cases. These operationsare concerned with missing parts or the replacement of damaged parts. Many studies emerged that dealtwith this important aspect of reconfiguring and completing the demolished parts in historical and heritagebuildings, whether at the level of the part or all according to specific laws, but no study of the formal andintellectual mechanisms used to rebuild and reconstruct these buildings and their potential for architecturalproductions. Therefore, the research problem that emerged from the lack of clarity of knowledge about themost important formal and intellectual mechanisms for rebuilding in architecture and its cognitive indicatorswithin the outcome emerged, and the research was divided into two parts, the first part represented by thegeneral theoretical presentation that included the reconstruction processes and related determinants andclarification of the mechanism of formalism (similar and its connections) Theory and intellectual mechanism(analogy and its theoretical correlations), previous studies and the second part which represented the appliedside to form the theoretical framework from the above and applied it to groups of architectural productionsand then presented and discussed and analyzed the results of that application up to the presentation ofCrowns and recommendations that were referring to the general vision of the basic concept of researchadopted, the mechanistic aspect of form rather than intellectual.","PeriodicalId":414074,"journal":{"name":"Association of Arab Universities Journal of Engineering Sciences","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Association of Arab Universities Journal of Engineering Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33261/JAARU.2021.28.1.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reconstruction of archaeological buildings with destroyed or collapsed parts is considered oneof the most important and accurate operations in the field of preserving those buildings, given the continuityof these operations in the continuity of those archaeological buildings with their architectural and technicaldetails, and even their continued performance in their urban environment in many cases. These operationsare concerned with missing parts or the replacement of damaged parts. Many studies emerged that dealtwith this important aspect of reconfiguring and completing the demolished parts in historical and heritagebuildings, whether at the level of the part or all according to specific laws, but no study of the formal andintellectual mechanisms used to rebuild and reconstruct these buildings and their potential for architecturalproductions. Therefore, the research problem that emerged from the lack of clarity of knowledge about themost important formal and intellectual mechanisms for rebuilding in architecture and its cognitive indicatorswithin the outcome emerged, and the research was divided into two parts, the first part represented by thegeneral theoretical presentation that included the reconstruction processes and related determinants andclarification of the mechanism of formalism (similar and its connections) Theory and intellectual mechanism(analogy and its theoretical correlations), previous studies and the second part which represented the appliedside to form the theoretical framework from the above and applied it to groups of architectural productionsand then presented and discussed and analyzed the results of that application up to the presentation ofCrowns and recommendations that were referring to the general vision of the basic concept of researchadopted, the mechanistic aspect of form rather than intellectual.
类似策略在价值建筑重建中的作用
重建被毁坏或倒塌的考古建筑被认为是保护这些建筑领域中最重要和最准确的工作之一,因为这些工作的连续性是这些考古建筑的建筑和技术细节的连续性,甚至在许多情况下,它们在城市环境中的持续表现。这些操作涉及丢失的部件或更换损坏的部件。许多研究都涉及到历史和遗产建筑中被拆除部分的重新配置和完成这一重要方面,无论是在部分层面还是在整体层面,都是根据特定的法律进行的,但没有研究用于重建和重建这些建筑的正式和智力机制,以及它们在建筑生产中的潜力。因此,由于缺乏对建筑重建最重要的形式和智力机制及其结果中的认知指标的清晰认识而出现的研究问题出现了,研究分为两个部分:第一部分为一般理论介绍,包括重建过程和相关决定因素,以及形式主义(相似及其联系)理论和智力机制(类比及其理论相关性)的机制澄清;之前的研究和第二部分代表了应用方面,从上面形成理论框架,并将其应用于建筑产品组,然后展示,讨论和分析应用的结果,直到提出crown和建议,这些建议涉及研究的基本概念的总体愿景,形式的机械方面,而不是智力方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信