How Social Robots Influence People’s Trust in Critical Situations

Alessandra Rossi, K. Dautenhahn, K. Koay, M. Walters
{"title":"How Social Robots Influence People’s Trust in Critical Situations","authors":"Alessandra Rossi, K. Dautenhahn, K. Koay, M. Walters","doi":"10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we expect that the presence of autonomous robots in our everyday life will increase, we must consider that people will have not only to accept robots to be a fundamental part of their lives, but they will also have to trust them to reliably and securely engage them in collaborative tasks. Several studies showed that robots are more comfortable interacting with robots that respect social conventions. However, it is still not clear if a robot that expresses social conventions will gain more favourably people’s trust. In this study, we aimed to assess whether the use of social behaviours and natural communications can affect humans’ sense of trust and companionship towards the robots. We conducted a between-subjects study where participants’ trust was tested in three scenarios with increasing trust criticality (low, medium, high) in which they interacted either with a social or a non-social robot. Our findings showed that participants trusted equally a social and non-social robot in the low and medium consequences scenario. On the contrary, we observed that participants’ choices of trusting the robot in a higher sensitive task was affected more by a robot that expressed social cues with a consequent decrease of their trust in the robot.","PeriodicalId":383722,"journal":{"name":"2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 29th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RO-MAN47096.2020.9223471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

As we expect that the presence of autonomous robots in our everyday life will increase, we must consider that people will have not only to accept robots to be a fundamental part of their lives, but they will also have to trust them to reliably and securely engage them in collaborative tasks. Several studies showed that robots are more comfortable interacting with robots that respect social conventions. However, it is still not clear if a robot that expresses social conventions will gain more favourably people’s trust. In this study, we aimed to assess whether the use of social behaviours and natural communications can affect humans’ sense of trust and companionship towards the robots. We conducted a between-subjects study where participants’ trust was tested in three scenarios with increasing trust criticality (low, medium, high) in which they interacted either with a social or a non-social robot. Our findings showed that participants trusted equally a social and non-social robot in the low and medium consequences scenario. On the contrary, we observed that participants’ choices of trusting the robot in a higher sensitive task was affected more by a robot that expressed social cues with a consequent decrease of their trust in the robot.
社交机器人在危急情况下如何影响人们的信任
由于我们预计自动机器人在我们日常生活中的存在将会增加,我们必须考虑到人们不仅要接受机器人成为他们生活的基本组成部分,而且他们还必须相信机器人能够可靠、安全地参与协作任务。几项研究表明,机器人更容易与尊重社会习俗的机器人互动。然而,目前还不清楚一个表达社会习俗的机器人是否会获得人们更有利的信任。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估社会行为和自然交流的使用是否会影响人类对机器人的信任感和陪伴感。我们进行了一项受试者之间的研究,在三种情况下测试参与者的信任,这些情况下他们与社交机器人或非社交机器人互动,信任临界度(低、中、高)不断增加。我们的研究结果表明,在低后果和中等后果的情况下,参与者同样信任社交机器人和非社交机器人。相反,我们观察到,参与者在高敏感任务中信任机器人的选择受到表达社交线索的机器人的影响更大,从而导致他们对机器人的信任减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信