Medical concept extraction: A comparison of statistical and semantic methods

Nyein Pyae Pyae Khin, Khin Thidar Lynn
{"title":"Medical concept extraction: A comparison of statistical and semantic methods","authors":"Nyein Pyae Pyae Khin, Khin Thidar Lynn","doi":"10.1109/SNPD.2017.8022697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of medical concept extraction is to identify phrases that refer to medical concepts of interest such as problems, treatments and tests from medical documents. In this study, three types of medical concept extraction models are developed and then compared them. The first concept extraction task is mainly based upon semantic features obtained from a domain-knowledge based method using MetaMap, and the other two are machine-learning methods with using sequential classifier Conditional Random Fields (CRF) for both with and without MetaMap outputs as features. Among the three concept extraction models, the combined approach of CRF with MetaMap features obtained the best results.","PeriodicalId":186094,"journal":{"name":"2017 18th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 18th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2017.8022697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The goal of medical concept extraction is to identify phrases that refer to medical concepts of interest such as problems, treatments and tests from medical documents. In this study, three types of medical concept extraction models are developed and then compared them. The first concept extraction task is mainly based upon semantic features obtained from a domain-knowledge based method using MetaMap, and the other two are machine-learning methods with using sequential classifier Conditional Random Fields (CRF) for both with and without MetaMap outputs as features. Among the three concept extraction models, the combined approach of CRF with MetaMap features obtained the best results.
医学概念提取:统计和语义方法的比较
医学概念提取的目标是从医学文档中识别与医学概念相关的短语,如问题、治疗和测试。本研究开发了三种医学概念提取模型,并对其进行了比较。第一个概念提取任务主要基于使用MetaMap的基于领域知识的方法获得的语义特征,另外两个是使用序列分类器条件随机场(CRF)作为特征的机器学习方法,无论是否使用MetaMap输出。在三种概念提取模型中,CRF与MetaMap特征相结合的方法获得了最好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信