Microdeformation of Infrastructure for Implant-Supported fixed Dental Prosthesis by Strain-Gauge Method: Influence of Technique and Material Impression

A. Tonetto, Zahra Fernandes Ebrahim, L. N. Junior, R. Araújo, V. Figueiredo, S. C. Teixeira
{"title":"Microdeformation of Infrastructure for Implant-Supported fixed Dental Prosthesis by Strain-Gauge Method: Influence of Technique and Material Impression","authors":"A. Tonetto, Zahra Fernandes Ebrahim, L. N. Junior, R. Araújo, V. Figueiredo, S. C. Teixeira","doi":"10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To verify the structural microdeformation by strain gages, around implants that have metal infrastructure, obtained by different materials and techniques impressions. Material and Methods: Three internal hexagon implants in polyurethane block (master model) with abutments were taken the impression with differents materials and techniques impression (n=4): addition silicon and transfer for open tray technique (Group I), condensation silicon and transfer for closed tray technique (Group II); and polyether and transfer for open tray techniques (Group III). Impressions were poured with type IV stone. Metallic infrastructure were made and installed in the master model by an aid of a manual ratchet wrench. A torque of 20N was used to install the metallic infrastructure. Microdeformation analysis was performed around the implants by strain gauge method. Two gauges were inserted into the polyurethane base, and three measurements were taken for each infrastructure. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inference. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to verify association between materials and impression techniques and deformation around the implants, at 5% confidence. Results: Microdeformations around the implants showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.123) between the experimental groups, Group I (215.8 µe), Group II (194.9 µe) and Group III (297.4 µe). Conclusion: The use of different materials and techniques impression to made of infrastructures for fixed implant-supported dental prosthesis did not present difference in microdeformation values around implants.","PeriodicalId":134552,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Research in Pediatric Dentistry and Integrated Clinic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4034/PBOCI.2015.151.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: To verify the structural microdeformation by strain gages, around implants that have metal infrastructure, obtained by different materials and techniques impressions. Material and Methods: Three internal hexagon implants in polyurethane block (master model) with abutments were taken the impression with differents materials and techniques impression (n=4): addition silicon and transfer for open tray technique (Group I), condensation silicon and transfer for closed tray technique (Group II); and polyether and transfer for open tray techniques (Group III). Impressions were poured with type IV stone. Metallic infrastructure were made and installed in the master model by an aid of a manual ratchet wrench. A torque of 20N was used to install the metallic infrastructure. Microdeformation analysis was performed around the implants by strain gauge method. Two gauges were inserted into the polyurethane base, and three measurements were taken for each infrastructure. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and inference. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to verify association between materials and impression techniques and deformation around the implants, at 5% confidence. Results: Microdeformations around the implants showed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.123) between the experimental groups, Group I (215.8 µe), Group II (194.9 µe) and Group III (297.4 µe). Conclusion: The use of different materials and techniques impression to made of infrastructures for fixed implant-supported dental prosthesis did not present difference in microdeformation values around implants.
应变片法种植固定义齿基础结构微变形:技术和材料印模的影响
目的:通过不同材料和技术的印模,通过应变片对金属基板种植体周围的结构微变形进行验证。材料和方法:采用不同材料和工艺对3个带基台的聚氨酯块(主模型)内六角种植体进行印模(n=4):开放托盘技术添加硅并转移(组I),封闭托盘技术冷凝硅并转移(组II);聚醚和转移开盘技术(组III)。用IV型石头浇筑印痕。通过手动棘轮扳手制作并安装在主模型上的金属基础结构。使用20N的扭矩来安装金属基础设施。采用应变片法对种植体周围进行微变形分析。将两个量规插入聚氨酯底座,并对每个基础设施进行三次测量。数据分析采用描述性统计和推理。Kruskal-Wallis测试用于验证材料和印模技术与植入物周围变形之间的关联,置信度为5%。结果:实验组与ⅰ组(215.8µe)、ⅱ组(194.9µe)、ⅲ组(297.4µe)种植体周围微变形差异无统计学意义(p = 0.123)。结论:采用不同材料和工艺对固定种植义齿基础印模,种植体周围微变形值无明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信