Blinded by magic: Electrophysiological correlates of change blindness

Monique Yuan, Sarah S. Sheldon, K. Mathewson
{"title":"Blinded by magic: Electrophysiological correlates of change blindness","authors":"Monique Yuan, Sarah S. Sheldon, K. Mathewson","doi":"10.29173/aar78","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magicians can often hide their method for a trick in plain sight by effecting a phenomenon known as change blindness. The purpose of this study was to find the reason for why an individual is induced with change blindness. Alpha oscillations are known to impair detection of visual stimuli, but it is unclear if this is due to increased guess rate or decreased fidelity of the mental representation. Here we estimated fidelity and guess rate as a function of pre-stimulus alpha oscillations using a change blindness task. In this study, each trial began with an array of 6 Gabor patches with a fixated dot that subjects were instructed to keep their eyes on. As the array traveled to the center of the screen, it either changed direction vertically at 90 degrees or continued horizontally. When the array switched direction, one of the Gabor patches rotated 30 degrees simultaneously. Subjects were then asked to identify which patch rotated. EEG (electroencephalography) data was simultaneously recorded with eye-tracking as subjects performed the task. Twenty-eight participants performed this task, which included six blocks of forty-eight trials. There were two different types of trials: flexion, in which the array changed direction, and control, in which the array did not change direction. Reaction time tended to be slower in flexion trials, and we found that the change in direction affected the subject’s ability to see the Gabor patch rotation. Based on the event-related potential results, which are an average of EEG signals aligned to the start of a trial, we could see that the P300 differed between correct flexion, incorrect flexion, and control trials. The P300 can be interpreted as a marker of consciousness. This difference demonstrates that the subject’s attention is automatically drawn to a larger change in stimuli.","PeriodicalId":239812,"journal":{"name":"Alberta Academic Review","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alberta Academic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29173/aar78","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magicians can often hide their method for a trick in plain sight by effecting a phenomenon known as change blindness. The purpose of this study was to find the reason for why an individual is induced with change blindness. Alpha oscillations are known to impair detection of visual stimuli, but it is unclear if this is due to increased guess rate or decreased fidelity of the mental representation. Here we estimated fidelity and guess rate as a function of pre-stimulus alpha oscillations using a change blindness task. In this study, each trial began with an array of 6 Gabor patches with a fixated dot that subjects were instructed to keep their eyes on. As the array traveled to the center of the screen, it either changed direction vertically at 90 degrees or continued horizontally. When the array switched direction, one of the Gabor patches rotated 30 degrees simultaneously. Subjects were then asked to identify which patch rotated. EEG (electroencephalography) data was simultaneously recorded with eye-tracking as subjects performed the task. Twenty-eight participants performed this task, which included six blocks of forty-eight trials. There were two different types of trials: flexion, in which the array changed direction, and control, in which the array did not change direction. Reaction time tended to be slower in flexion trials, and we found that the change in direction affected the subject’s ability to see the Gabor patch rotation. Based on the event-related potential results, which are an average of EEG signals aligned to the start of a trial, we could see that the P300 differed between correct flexion, incorrect flexion, and control trials. The P300 can be interpreted as a marker of consciousness. This difference demonstrates that the subject’s attention is automatically drawn to a larger change in stimuli.
魔法致盲:变化致盲的电生理相关
魔术师通常可以通过一种被称为“变化盲视”的现象,将他们的戏法方法隐藏在人们的视线中。本研究的目的是找出个体产生变化盲视的原因。已知α振荡会损害视觉刺激的检测,但尚不清楚这是由于猜测率增加还是心理表征的保真度降低。在这里,我们估计保真度和猜测率作为前刺激α振荡的函数使用变化盲视任务。在这项研究中,每次试验都以6个Gabor贴片开始,贴片上有一个固定的点,受试者被指示盯着这个点。当数组移动到屏幕中心时,它要么垂直改变方向90度,要么继续水平移动。当阵列改变方向时,其中一个Gabor补丁同时旋转30度。然后,受试者被要求识别哪个贴片在旋转。在受试者执行任务时,同时记录脑电图(EEG)数据和眼球追踪。28名参与者完成了这项任务,其中包括6组48次试验。有两种不同类型的试验:弯曲,其中阵列改变方向,和控制,其中阵列不改变方向。在屈曲试验中,反应时间往往会变慢,我们发现方向的改变影响了受试者看到Gabor斑块旋转的能力。根据事件相关电位结果,即实验开始时脑电图信号的平均值,我们可以看到P300在正确屈曲、不正确屈曲和对照试验之间存在差异。P300可以被理解为意识的标志。这种差异表明,受试者的注意力会自动地被吸引到刺激的更大变化上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信