Protecting Digital Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) Data

F. Law, P. Lai, Z. L. Jiang, R. Ieong, M. Kwan, K. Chow, L. Hui, S. Yiu, C. Chong
{"title":"Protecting Digital Legal Professional Privilege (LPP) Data","authors":"F. Law, P. Lai, Z. L. Jiang, R. Ieong, M. Kwan, K. Chow, L. Hui, S. Yiu, C. Chong","doi":"10.1109/SADFE.2008.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To enable free communication between legal advisor and his client for proper functioning of the legal system, certain documents, known as legal professional privilege (TPP) documents, can be excluded as evidence for prosecution. In physical world, protection of TPP information is well addressed and proper procedure for handling TPP articles has been established. However, there does not exist a forensically sound procedure for protecting \"digital\" TPP information. In this paper, we try to address this important, but rarely addressed, issue. We point out the difficulties of handling digital TPP data and discuss the shortcomings of the current practices, then we propose a feasible procedure for solving this problem.","PeriodicalId":391486,"journal":{"name":"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 Third International Workshop on Systematic Approaches to Digital Forensic Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SADFE.2008.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

To enable free communication between legal advisor and his client for proper functioning of the legal system, certain documents, known as legal professional privilege (TPP) documents, can be excluded as evidence for prosecution. In physical world, protection of TPP information is well addressed and proper procedure for handling TPP articles has been established. However, there does not exist a forensically sound procedure for protecting "digital" TPP information. In this paper, we try to address this important, but rarely addressed, issue. We point out the difficulties of handling digital TPP data and discuss the shortcomings of the current practices, then we propose a feasible procedure for solving this problem.
保护数字法律专业特权(LPP)数据
为了使法律顾问和客户之间能够自由沟通,使法律制度能够正常运作,某些文件,即法律专业特权(TPP)文件,可以被排除作为起诉的证据。在现实世界中,TPP的信息保护得到了很好的解决,并建立了处理TPP条款的适当程序。然而,对于保护TPP的“数字”信息,目前尚不存在一个法医学上合理的程序。在本文中,我们试图解决这个重要的,但很少被提及的问题。本文指出了数字化TPP数据处理的难点,讨论了当前实践的不足,并提出了解决这一问题的可行方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信