Counting Graphlets: Space vs Time

M. Bressan, Flavio Chierichetti, Ravi Kumar, S. Leucci, A. Panconesi
{"title":"Counting Graphlets: Space vs Time","authors":"M. Bressan, Flavio Chierichetti, Ravi Kumar, S. Leucci, A. Panconesi","doi":"10.1145/3018661.3018732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Counting graphlets is a well-studied problem in graph mining and social network analysis. Recently, several papers explored very simple and natural approaches based on Monte Carlo sampling of Markov Chains (MC), and reported encouraging results. We show, perhaps surprisingly, that this approach is outperformed by a carefully engineered version of color coding (CC) [1], a sophisticated algorithmic technique that we extend to the case of graphlet sampling and for which we prove strong statistical guarantees. Our computational experiments on graphs with millions of nodes show CC to be more accurate than MC. Furthermore, we formally show that the mixing time of the MC approach is too high in general, even when the input graph has high conductance. All this comes at a price however. While MC is very efficient in terms of space, CC's memory requirements become demanding when the size of the input graph and that of the graphlets grow. And yet, our experiments show that a careful implementation of CC can push the limits of the state of the art, both in terms of the size of the input graph and of that of the graphlets.","PeriodicalId":344017,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"75","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3018661.3018732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

Abstract

Counting graphlets is a well-studied problem in graph mining and social network analysis. Recently, several papers explored very simple and natural approaches based on Monte Carlo sampling of Markov Chains (MC), and reported encouraging results. We show, perhaps surprisingly, that this approach is outperformed by a carefully engineered version of color coding (CC) [1], a sophisticated algorithmic technique that we extend to the case of graphlet sampling and for which we prove strong statistical guarantees. Our computational experiments on graphs with millions of nodes show CC to be more accurate than MC. Furthermore, we formally show that the mixing time of the MC approach is too high in general, even when the input graph has high conductance. All this comes at a price however. While MC is very efficient in terms of space, CC's memory requirements become demanding when the size of the input graph and that of the graphlets grow. And yet, our experiments show that a careful implementation of CC can push the limits of the state of the art, both in terms of the size of the input graph and of that of the graphlets.
计算graphlet:空间vs时间
图元计数是图挖掘和社会网络分析中一个被广泛研究的问题。最近,一些论文探索了基于马尔可夫链(MC)的蒙特卡罗采样的非常简单和自然的方法,并报告了令人鼓舞的结果。也许令人惊讶的是,我们展示了一种精心设计的颜色编码(CC)[1]版本优于这种方法,这是一种复杂的算法技术,我们将其扩展到石墨笔采样的情况下,并证明了其强大的统计保证。我们在具有数百万个节点的图上的计算实验表明,CC方法比MC方法更准确。此外,我们正式表明,MC方法的混合时间通常太高,即使输入图具有高电导。然而,这一切都是有代价的。虽然MC在空间方面非常高效,但当输入图和graphlet的大小增长时,CC的内存需求会变得非常苛刻。然而,我们的实验表明,仔细实现CC可以突破当前技术的极限,无论是在输入图的大小还是在graphlet的大小方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信