600mm Fan-Out Panel Level Packaging (FOPLP) As A Scale Up Alternative to 300mm Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP) with 6-Sided Die Protection

Jacinta Aman Lim, Yun-Mook Park, Edil De Vera, Byung-Cheol Kim, B. Dunlap
{"title":"600mm Fan-Out Panel Level Packaging (FOPLP) As A Scale Up Alternative to 300mm Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP) with 6-Sided Die Protection","authors":"Jacinta Aman Lim, Yun-Mook Park, Edil De Vera, Byung-Cheol Kim, B. Dunlap","doi":"10.1109/ECTC32696.2021.00174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The need for migrating to carrier sizes larger than 300mm becomes a necessity to lower down costs and handle higher volumes. As the demand for PMICs, RF and other single die applications increases for Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP) processing on mainstream carrier sizes, large Panel Level Processing to meet these demands become a natural progression to an already burgeoning market. However, not all products would benefit from migrating from 300mm/330mm carrier to large panel. If the total area of the panel is not fully utilized, it results in material waste and loss. While FOWLP has been established as one of the most versatile packaging technologies in the recent past and already accounts for over $1.2 billion USD due to its unique advantages, traditional 300mm round carrier used for processing FOWLP is still cost inhibitive. This paper will present the background of utilizing $\\mathrm{600}\\text{mm}\\times \\mathrm{600}\\text{mm}$ square panel size and show an example of leveraging from existing equipment for backend processing for cost considerations. We will also review the processing method for 6-sided die protection of a single die and how it translates to $\\mathrm{600}\\text{mm}\\times \\mathrm{600}\\text{mm}$ square panel processing. Comparisons between usable area of 300mm round carrier versus $\\mathrm{600}\\text{mm}\\times \\mathrm{600}\\text{mm}$ square panel, sweet spot recommendation for pricing per unit based on body size and Component Level Reliability (CLR) will be presented.","PeriodicalId":351817,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","volume":"433 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ECTC32696.2021.00174","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The need for migrating to carrier sizes larger than 300mm becomes a necessity to lower down costs and handle higher volumes. As the demand for PMICs, RF and other single die applications increases for Fan-Out Wafer Level Packaging (FOWLP) processing on mainstream carrier sizes, large Panel Level Processing to meet these demands become a natural progression to an already burgeoning market. However, not all products would benefit from migrating from 300mm/330mm carrier to large panel. If the total area of the panel is not fully utilized, it results in material waste and loss. While FOWLP has been established as one of the most versatile packaging technologies in the recent past and already accounts for over $1.2 billion USD due to its unique advantages, traditional 300mm round carrier used for processing FOWLP is still cost inhibitive. This paper will present the background of utilizing $\mathrm{600}\text{mm}\times \mathrm{600}\text{mm}$ square panel size and show an example of leveraging from existing equipment for backend processing for cost considerations. We will also review the processing method for 6-sided die protection of a single die and how it translates to $\mathrm{600}\text{mm}\times \mathrm{600}\text{mm}$ square panel processing. Comparisons between usable area of 300mm round carrier versus $\mathrm{600}\text{mm}\times \mathrm{600}\text{mm}$ square panel, sweet spot recommendation for pricing per unit based on body size and Component Level Reliability (CLR) will be presented.
600mm扇出面板级封装(FOPLP)作为带6面模具保护的300mm扇出晶圆级封装(FOWLP)的放大替代方案
为了降低成本和处理更高的产量,需要迁移到大于300mm的载体尺寸。随着主流载波尺寸的扇出晶圆级封装(FOWLP)加工对pmic, RF和其他单芯片应用的需求增加,满足这些需求的大面板级加工成为已经蓬勃发展的市场的自然发展。然而,并不是所有的产品都能从从300mm/330mm的载体到大型面板的迁移中受益。如果没有充分利用面板的总面积,就会造成材料的浪费和损失。虽然近年来FOWLP已经成为最通用的封装技术之一,由于其独特的优势,已经超过12亿美元,但用于加工FOWLP的传统300mm圆形载体仍然是成本抑制的。本文将介绍利用$\mathrm{600}\text{mm}\乘以\mathrm{600}\text{mm}$正方形面板尺寸的背景,并展示一个利用现有设备进行后端处理的示例,以考虑成本。我们还将回顾单个模具的六面模具保护的加工方法,以及如何转化为$\ mathm {600}\text{mm}\倍\ mathm {600}\text{mm}$方形面板加工。300mm圆形载体的可用面积与$\ mathm {600}\text{mm}\乘以$ mathm {600}\text{mm}$方形载体的可用面积的比较,以及基于机身尺寸和组件级可靠性(CLR)的单位定价的最佳点建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信