{"title":"La subjetividad jurídica de los animales según la jurisprudencia argentina","authors":"Adriana Norma Martínez, Adriana Margarita Porcelli","doi":"10.20983/reij.2020.1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"En el presente articulo de revision jurisprudencial se hace un analisis comparativo de todas las sentencias resueltas en Argentina, hasta el ano 2018, referidas a la categorizacion juridica de los animales. En cumplimiento de tal objetivo, la metodologia utilizada consistio en identificar las concepciones filosoficas, eticas y juridicas sustentadas en cada una de ellas, para posteriormente efectuar un analisis comparativo de las mismas. Abstract The purpose of this jurisprudential review article is the comparative analysis of all judgments resolved in Argentina, until 2018, regarding the legal categorization of animals. In compliance with this objective, the methodology used consisted of identifying the philosophical, ethical and legal conceptions supported in each one of them to make a comparative analysis of the same.","PeriodicalId":334972,"journal":{"name":"Revista Especializada en Investigación Jurídica","volume":"716 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Especializada en Investigación Jurídica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20983/reij.2020.1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
En el presente articulo de revision jurisprudencial se hace un analisis comparativo de todas las sentencias resueltas en Argentina, hasta el ano 2018, referidas a la categorizacion juridica de los animales. En cumplimiento de tal objetivo, la metodologia utilizada consistio en identificar las concepciones filosoficas, eticas y juridicas sustentadas en cada una de ellas, para posteriormente efectuar un analisis comparativo de las mismas. Abstract The purpose of this jurisprudential review article is the comparative analysis of all judgments resolved in Argentina, until 2018, regarding the legal categorization of animals. In compliance with this objective, the methodology used consisted of identifying the philosophical, ethical and legal conceptions supported in each one of them to make a comparative analysis of the same.