The legal nature of actual expense medical insurance & consideration of practical issues: Focusing on the liability for compensation related to the cap on personal charges

H. -. Kim, Sang-Soo Ha
{"title":"The legal nature of actual expense medical insurance & consideration of practical issues: Focusing on the liability for compensation related to the cap on personal charges","authors":"H. -. Kim, Sang-Soo Ha","doi":"10.36248/kdps.2023.17.2.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Actual expense medical insurance can be said to be the “second health insurance” that compensates for medical expenses actually borne by the insured among medical expenses incurred when the insured receives treatment at a medical institution due to illness or injury. In line with the effectiveness of such loss medical insurance, there are also a wide variety of issues and practical disputes surrounding it, especially in recent years, disputes related to the self-burden ceiling to be dealt with in this paper. Depending on the patient's income level, the National Health Insurance Service returns the excess amount to the subscriber through pre-payments and post-refund if the health insurance's self-payment exceeds the upper limit for each individual. \nIn particular, disputes arose frequently over what would be the liability for compensation in indemnity medical insurance before October 2009, when post-refund was not stipulated as an exemption. In this regard, the Supreme Court's recent ruling on 2022da304332 on March 30, 2023 (the Seoul Central District Court's ruling on November 15, 2022na77212) does not constitute an insurance accident, that is, an out-of-pocket cost, regardless of the timing of implementation of the out-of-pocket limit system. Nevertheless, there is still controversy over whether the upper limit can be deducted before or after the revision of the terms and conditions, whether the terms and conditions stipulated after October 2009 are unfairly disadvantageous to the customer, and whether the terms and conditions are subject to explanation. \nAbove all, it will be a key issue in determining the liability for compensation for practical issues, including post-refunds, depending on whether the nature of loss medical insurance is considered personal insurance, non-life insurance, or both. \nIn consideration of this, we would like to analyze the lower court's ruling, including the Supreme Court's ruling on the self-burden ceiling, review various issues derived here and recent issues related to the liability for compensation of loss medical insurance, and consider the responsibility for compensation and improvement.","PeriodicalId":129340,"journal":{"name":"Korean Insurance Law Association","volume":"290 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Insurance Law Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36248/kdps.2023.17.2.037","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Actual expense medical insurance can be said to be the “second health insurance” that compensates for medical expenses actually borne by the insured among medical expenses incurred when the insured receives treatment at a medical institution due to illness or injury. In line with the effectiveness of such loss medical insurance, there are also a wide variety of issues and practical disputes surrounding it, especially in recent years, disputes related to the self-burden ceiling to be dealt with in this paper. Depending on the patient's income level, the National Health Insurance Service returns the excess amount to the subscriber through pre-payments and post-refund if the health insurance's self-payment exceeds the upper limit for each individual. In particular, disputes arose frequently over what would be the liability for compensation in indemnity medical insurance before October 2009, when post-refund was not stipulated as an exemption. In this regard, the Supreme Court's recent ruling on 2022da304332 on March 30, 2023 (the Seoul Central District Court's ruling on November 15, 2022na77212) does not constitute an insurance accident, that is, an out-of-pocket cost, regardless of the timing of implementation of the out-of-pocket limit system. Nevertheless, there is still controversy over whether the upper limit can be deducted before or after the revision of the terms and conditions, whether the terms and conditions stipulated after October 2009 are unfairly disadvantageous to the customer, and whether the terms and conditions are subject to explanation. Above all, it will be a key issue in determining the liability for compensation for practical issues, including post-refunds, depending on whether the nature of loss medical insurance is considered personal insurance, non-life insurance, or both. In consideration of this, we would like to analyze the lower court's ruling, including the Supreme Court's ruling on the self-burden ceiling, review various issues derived here and recent issues related to the liability for compensation of loss medical insurance, and consider the responsibility for compensation and improvement.
实费医疗保险的法律性质及现实问题的思考:以个人收费上限相关的赔偿责任为重点
实际费用医疗保险可以说是在被保险人因患病或受伤到医疗机构治疗所发生的医疗费用中,对被保险人实际承担的医疗费用进行补偿的“第二健康保险”。与这种损失医疗保险的有效性相一致的是,围绕它也存在着各种各样的问题和现实纠纷,特别是近年来与自我负担上限有关的纠纷,本文要处理。国民健康保险公团根据患者的收入水平,如果超过每人的健康保险自付额上限,就通过提前支付和事后退还的方式将超出的金额返还给加入者。特别是,在2009年10月之前,经常发生关于赔偿医疗保险赔偿责任的争端,当时退款后没有规定为豁免。因此,大法院最近在2023年3月30日做出的2022da304332号判决(首尔中央地方法院11月15日2022na77212号判决)与自付限额制度的实施时间无关,都不构成保险事故,即自付费用。然而,对于条款修改前后是否可以扣除上限、2009年10月以后规定的条款是否对客户不利、条款是否需要解释等问题,目前仍存在争议。最重要的是,根据损失医疗保险的性质是被视为个人保险、非人寿保险还是两者兼而有之,这将是确定包括退款后在内的实际问题的赔偿责任的关键问题。考虑到这一点,我们想分析包括大法院对自我负担上限的判决在内的下级法院的判决,回顾这里衍生的各种问题以及最近与损失医疗保险赔偿责任相关的问题,并考虑赔偿责任和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信