Econometrics for Decision Making: Building Foundations Sketched by Haavelmo and Wald

C. Manski
{"title":"Econometrics for Decision Making: Building Foundations Sketched by Haavelmo and Wald","authors":"C. Manski","doi":"10.3386/w26596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Haavelmo (1944) proposed a probabilistic structure for econometric modeling, aiming to make econometrics useful for decision making. His fundamental contribution has become thoroughly embedded in econometric research, yet it could not answer all the deep issues that the author raised. Notably, Haavelmo struggled to formalize the implications for decision making of the fact that models can at most approximate actuality. In the same period, Wald (1939, 1945) initiated his own seminal development of statistical decision theory. Haavelmo favorably cited Wald, but econometrics did not embrace statistical decision theory. Instead, it focused on study of identification, estimation, and statistical inference. This paper proposes use of statistical decision theory to evaluate the performance of models in decision making. I consider the common practice of \n as‐if optimization: specification of a model, point estimation of its parameters, and use of the point estimate to make a decision that would be optimal if the estimate were accurate. A central theme is that one should evaluate as‐if optimization or any other model‐based decision rule by its performance across the state space, listing all states of nature that one believes feasible, not across the model space. I apply the theme to prediction and treatment choice. Statistical decision theory is conceptually simple, but application is often challenging. Advancing computation is the primary task to complete the foundations sketched by Haavelmo and Wald.","PeriodicalId":200007,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","volume":"266 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Statistical Decision Theory; Operations Research (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3386/w26596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

Abstract

Haavelmo (1944) proposed a probabilistic structure for econometric modeling, aiming to make econometrics useful for decision making. His fundamental contribution has become thoroughly embedded in econometric research, yet it could not answer all the deep issues that the author raised. Notably, Haavelmo struggled to formalize the implications for decision making of the fact that models can at most approximate actuality. In the same period, Wald (1939, 1945) initiated his own seminal development of statistical decision theory. Haavelmo favorably cited Wald, but econometrics did not embrace statistical decision theory. Instead, it focused on study of identification, estimation, and statistical inference. This paper proposes use of statistical decision theory to evaluate the performance of models in decision making. I consider the common practice of as‐if optimization: specification of a model, point estimation of its parameters, and use of the point estimate to make a decision that would be optimal if the estimate were accurate. A central theme is that one should evaluate as‐if optimization or any other model‐based decision rule by its performance across the state space, listing all states of nature that one believes feasible, not across the model space. I apply the theme to prediction and treatment choice. Statistical decision theory is conceptually simple, but application is often challenging. Advancing computation is the primary task to complete the foundations sketched by Haavelmo and Wald.
决策的计量经济学:Haavelmo和Wald勾勒的建筑基础
20世纪40年代初,Haavelmo提出了计量经济学建模的概率结构,旨在使计量经济学对公共决策有用。他的基本贡献已经深入到后来的计量经济学研究中,但并不能完全回答作者提出的所有深层次问题。值得注意的是,Haavelmo努力将模型最多只能近似现实这一事实的决策含义形式化。在同一时期,沃尔德开创了他自己的统计决策理论的开创性发展。Haavelmo赞许地引用了Wald,但计量经济学随后并没有接受统计决策理论。相反,它侧重于识别、估计和统计推断的研究。本文提出统计决策理论作为评估模型在决策中的性能的框架。我特别考虑了as-if优化的常见实践:模型的规范,参数的点估计,以及使用点估计来做出决策,如果估计是准确的,那么这将是最优的。一个中心主题是,应该通过其跨状态空间(而不是模型空间)的性能来评估as-if优化或任何其他基于模型的决策规则。我用预测和治疗选择来说明。统计决策理论在概念上很简单,但应用起来往往很有挑战性。计算的进步是继续建立Haavelmo和Wald所描绘的基础的首要任务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信