INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BODIES REGARDING THE INSTITUTION OF WAIVING THE RIGHT TO APPEAL – GLOSS TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE VOIVODSHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN SZCZECIN FROM MARCH, 25 2021, II SA/SZ 808/20

Tomasz Kosicki
{"title":"INFORMATION OBLIGATIONS OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION BODIES REGARDING THE INSTITUTION OF WAIVING THE RIGHT TO APPEAL – GLOSS TO THE JUDGMENT OF THE VOIVODSHIP ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN SZCZECIN FROM MARCH, 25 2021, II SA/SZ 808/20","authors":"Tomasz Kosicki","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0015.8316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This gloss is of an approving nature and concerns the fulfillment of the information obligation towards the parties to administrative proceedings by public administration bodies in connection with the waiver of the right to appeal. This institution, concisely regulated in art. 127a of the Code of Administrative Procedure, from the moment it becomes effective, it raises a number of interpretation doubts. They refer not only to the parties’ declaration of waiver of the above-mentioned right, but also the deadline for its submission or the possibility of withdrawing it before the deadline for appeal. These doubts led to divergent views in the doctrine and judicature. This, in turn, creates a state of legal uncertainty for the parties to the proceedings. The administrative judiciary is trying to rectify this, a good example of which is the voted judgment. In this judgment it was rightly argued that if the mental development or health condition indicates that the information obtained by a party about the possibility and consequences of waiving the right to appeal did not arrive in an appropriate manner, the public administration authorities are obligated to take all steps which will cause the party to accept the information. The gloss emphasises that the authority, instructing the party about its right to waive the right to appeal, may not limit itself to the general indication of the effects of the decision obtaining the final and validity of the decision, but should also inform the party that the submission of such a declaration they deprive it of the possibility to lodge a complaint to an administrative court.\n\n","PeriodicalId":158454,"journal":{"name":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roczniki Administracji i Prawa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0015.8316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This gloss is of an approving nature and concerns the fulfillment of the information obligation towards the parties to administrative proceedings by public administration bodies in connection with the waiver of the right to appeal. This institution, concisely regulated in art. 127a of the Code of Administrative Procedure, from the moment it becomes effective, it raises a number of interpretation doubts. They refer not only to the parties’ declaration of waiver of the above-mentioned right, but also the deadline for its submission or the possibility of withdrawing it before the deadline for appeal. These doubts led to divergent views in the doctrine and judicature. This, in turn, creates a state of legal uncertainty for the parties to the proceedings. The administrative judiciary is trying to rectify this, a good example of which is the voted judgment. In this judgment it was rightly argued that if the mental development or health condition indicates that the information obtained by a party about the possibility and consequences of waiving the right to appeal did not arrive in an appropriate manner, the public administration authorities are obligated to take all steps which will cause the party to accept the information. The gloss emphasises that the authority, instructing the party about its right to waive the right to appeal, may not limit itself to the general indication of the effects of the decision obtaining the final and validity of the decision, but should also inform the party that the submission of such a declaration they deprive it of the possibility to lodge a complaint to an administrative court.
公共行政机关关于放弃上诉权制度的信息义务——对2021年3月25日在捷克省行政法院作出的判决的解释,见sa / sz 808/20
这一解释具有批准性质,涉及公共行政机构在放弃上诉权方面履行对行政诉讼当事人的信息义务。这一制度在艺术上得到了简明的规定。《行政程序法》第127a条,从生效之日起,就引起了一些解释上的疑问。它们不仅指当事各方宣布放弃上述权利,而且也指提出上述权利的最后期限或在上诉截止日期之前撤销该权利的可能性。这些疑问导致了理论和司法上的分歧。这反过来又给诉讼各方造成了法律上的不确定性。行政司法正在努力纠正这一点,投票判决就是一个很好的例子。在这一判决中,正确的论点是,如果精神发展或健康状况表明,当事人所获得的关于放弃上诉权的可能性和后果的信息没有以适当的方式到达,公共行政当局有义务采取一切步骤,使当事人接受这些信息。该说明强调,指示当事人放弃上诉权的主管机关不得局限于一般性地说明获得最终效力的决定的效力,而且还应告知当事人,提交这种声明将剥夺其向行政法院提出申诉的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信