Optimised Tripping and Drilling Performance Through Drilling Control System Automation to Control Axial Velocity

R. Bacon
{"title":"Optimised Tripping and Drilling Performance Through Drilling Control System Automation to Control Axial Velocity","authors":"R. Bacon","doi":"10.2523/iptc-22969-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n The purpose of this paper is to document an ongoing project called \"Dual - velocity tubular running\" which is being used to optimize the drill-string and casing running speeds, with the view to trip as efficiently and quickly as the rig and geo pressure limitations allow but doing so in a safe manner that prevents nonproductive time, both visible and invisible, and always retains the wells integrity and allows safe operations. Dual speed refers to the ability to target an initial speed to safely break the mud gels, and a second tripping speed permissible once those same gels are broken, and this is illustrated in Figure 1.\n This ‘dual speed’ optimization approach can be achieved by a more advanced use of mud gel-break and rheology data and a new auto sequence for stepwise axial velocity control.\n This project is a step change in targeting an autonomous and optimized drilling process, and the impressive results that can be achieved can be seen in figure 2 above.\n As many authors have noted, such as Cayeux E., E. W. Dvergsnes, F. P. Iversen 2009 there are many factors that contribute to nonproductive time, which include Lost circulation, formation influx, pack-offs and other stuck pipe events which cause delays, problems, lost time, and generally increase risk, and cost of the well, during drilling operations. Each of these has the potential to escalate into serious problems that can result in undesirable technical sidetracks. Couple this with ever more complex wells, (whether they be long horizontal sections, multi-laterals, etc.), and ensuring operations are done safely and efficiently is paramount. Furthermore, the traditional metrics of time and cost, are now further modified by the requirements to reduce the carbon footprint of operations. Anything which allows the well operations to be completed more quickly reduces the carbon footprint of the operation. The solution and concept presented in this paper showcases a modelling approach which allows all these situations to be accurately modelled in a transient setting, to optimize tubular running speeds – be that drill pipe, casing, liners, expandable liners, sand screens or any tubular string run in hole, and then also compared and back modelled using all the available real time high frequency data. This coupled with an automated drilling control system has resulted in safe, record-breaking drilling achievements in the North Sea. The models allow updated safeguards to be applied to the drilling control system to maintain a downhole pressure within the acceptable limits of the open hole formations. It also automatically stops the movement of the drill string in case of abnormal hook loads or surface torques. Since automatic actions can be triggered in case of an unexpected situation, some standard procedures have been fully automated, including friction tests and back-reaming. In prior papers such as Cayeux E., B. Daireaux, E. W. Dvergsnes, 2010,\" Automation of Mud-Pump Management : Application to Drilling Operations in the North Sea , the peak surge seen when pipe is first moved and gels are ‘broken’ has been used as the limit for safe tripping, however that precluded further optimization that exists once gels are broken, and pipe and fluid is in motion. This optimization process will be discussed in detail in this paper.\n","PeriodicalId":185347,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Fri, March 03, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/iptc-22969-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to document an ongoing project called "Dual - velocity tubular running" which is being used to optimize the drill-string and casing running speeds, with the view to trip as efficiently and quickly as the rig and geo pressure limitations allow but doing so in a safe manner that prevents nonproductive time, both visible and invisible, and always retains the wells integrity and allows safe operations. Dual speed refers to the ability to target an initial speed to safely break the mud gels, and a second tripping speed permissible once those same gels are broken, and this is illustrated in Figure 1. This ‘dual speed’ optimization approach can be achieved by a more advanced use of mud gel-break and rheology data and a new auto sequence for stepwise axial velocity control. This project is a step change in targeting an autonomous and optimized drilling process, and the impressive results that can be achieved can be seen in figure 2 above. As many authors have noted, such as Cayeux E., E. W. Dvergsnes, F. P. Iversen 2009 there are many factors that contribute to nonproductive time, which include Lost circulation, formation influx, pack-offs and other stuck pipe events which cause delays, problems, lost time, and generally increase risk, and cost of the well, during drilling operations. Each of these has the potential to escalate into serious problems that can result in undesirable technical sidetracks. Couple this with ever more complex wells, (whether they be long horizontal sections, multi-laterals, etc.), and ensuring operations are done safely and efficiently is paramount. Furthermore, the traditional metrics of time and cost, are now further modified by the requirements to reduce the carbon footprint of operations. Anything which allows the well operations to be completed more quickly reduces the carbon footprint of the operation. The solution and concept presented in this paper showcases a modelling approach which allows all these situations to be accurately modelled in a transient setting, to optimize tubular running speeds – be that drill pipe, casing, liners, expandable liners, sand screens or any tubular string run in hole, and then also compared and back modelled using all the available real time high frequency data. This coupled with an automated drilling control system has resulted in safe, record-breaking drilling achievements in the North Sea. The models allow updated safeguards to be applied to the drilling control system to maintain a downhole pressure within the acceptable limits of the open hole formations. It also automatically stops the movement of the drill string in case of abnormal hook loads or surface torques. Since automatic actions can be triggered in case of an unexpected situation, some standard procedures have been fully automated, including friction tests and back-reaming. In prior papers such as Cayeux E., B. Daireaux, E. W. Dvergsnes, 2010," Automation of Mud-Pump Management : Application to Drilling Operations in the North Sea , the peak surge seen when pipe is first moved and gels are ‘broken’ has been used as the limit for safe tripping, however that precluded further optimization that exists once gels are broken, and pipe and fluid is in motion. This optimization process will be discussed in detail in this paper.
通过钻井控制系统自动化控制轴向速度,优化起下钻和钻井性能
本文的目的是记录一个正在进行的名为“双速度管柱下入”的项目,该项目用于优化钻柱和套管的下入速度,以期在钻机和地质压力限制的情况下尽可能高效、快速地起下钻,同时以安全的方式进行,避免出现可见和不可见的非生产时间,并始终保持井的完整性,确保安全作业。双速度指的是安全破胶的初始速度,以及破胶后允许的二次起下钻速度,如图1所示。这种“双速度”优化方法可以通过更先进地使用泥浆凝胶破碎和流变数据以及新的自动顺序逐步轴向速度控制来实现。该项目是朝着自主和优化钻井过程的目标迈出的一步,所取得的令人印象深刻的成果如上图2所示。正如许多作者(如Cayeux E.、E. W. Dvergsnes、F. P. Iversen 2009)所指出的那样,造成非生产时间的因素有很多,包括井漏、地层流入、封隔和其他卡钻事件,这些事件会导致钻井作业的延迟、问题、时间损失,通常会增加钻井风险和成本。这些问题都有可能升级为严重的问题,从而导致不受欢迎的技术岔路。与更复杂的井(无论是长水平段、多分支井等)相结合,确保安全高效地完成作业至关重要。此外,传统的时间和成本指标现在被要求进一步修改,以减少操作的碳足迹。任何能够使作业更快完成的方法都可以减少作业的碳足迹。本文提出的解决方案和概念展示了一种建模方法,该方法可以在瞬态环境中准确地模拟所有这些情况,以优化管柱的下入速度——无论是钻杆、套管、衬管、膨胀衬管、防砂筛管还是任何在井中下入的管柱,然后使用所有可用的实时高频数据进行比较和反向建模。该系统与自动化钻井控制系统相结合,在北海取得了创纪录的安全钻井成果。该模型允许更新的保障措施应用于钻井控制系统,以将井下压力保持在裸眼地层的可接受范围内。它还可以在异常的钩载荷或表面扭矩情况下自动停止钻柱的运动。由于在意外情况下可以触发自动操作,因此一些标准程序已经完全自动化,包括摩擦测试和后扩孔。在Cayeux E., B. Daireaux, E. W. Dvergsnes, 2010年的论文《泥浆泵管理自动化:在北海钻井作业中的应用》中,当管道第一次移动,凝胶被“破坏”时,所见的峰值浪涌被用作安全起下钻的限制,然而,一旦凝胶被破坏,管道和流体处于运动状态,这就阻碍了进一步的优化。本文将详细讨论这一优化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信