Evolving Completion Designs to Optimize Well Productivity from a Low Permeability Oil Sandstone Turner Reservoir in the Powder River Basin—One Operator's Experience

Karn Agarwal, Justin Kegel, B. Ballard, E. Lolon, M. Mayerhofer, L. Weijers, H. Melcher, Sarah Compton, P. Turner
{"title":"Evolving Completion Designs to Optimize Well Productivity from a Low Permeability Oil Sandstone Turner Reservoir in the Powder River Basin—One Operator's Experience","authors":"Karn Agarwal, Justin Kegel, B. Ballard, E. Lolon, M. Mayerhofer, L. Weijers, H. Melcher, Sarah Compton, P. Turner","doi":"10.2118/194350-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n As the Powder River Basin (PRB) development continues and more wells are drilled, identifying best completion practices is critical to economic success. This operator has completed several Turner horizontal wells drilled at 10,300-11,000 ft TVD using crosslinked gel with encouraging results. Although reservoir quality varies in the basin, the Turner interval is more than 30 ft thick in the area of interest (AOI) in Campbell County, Wyoming. In this area, production history matched permeability ranges from 0.005 to 0.1 mD, with pore pressure gradient from 0.55 to 0.64 psi/ft. Fracture modeling and production history matching/sensitivities were performed on a few horizontal wells. This paper discusses the results of this modeling and history matching, and it summarizes the evolution of Turner Formation fracture treatment designs, that were done by one operator to maximize the return on investment.\n The operator collected core data, open hole logs, and Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT) data. The objectives of this study were to: a) determine reservoir parameters from DFIT, b) estimate fracture height growth, fracture half-length, and conductivity for Turner crosslinked gel fracs, c) determine the most appropriate perforation cluster or fracture spacing, as well as treatment rate, fluid/proppant loading, and proppant types/sizes based on the expected long-term production performance, d) compare the estimated production of cemented sleeve vs. plug-and-perf completions, and e) perform multivariate analysis of public production and completion data to compare with the detailed physical modeling.\n The results presented in this paper show well-performance predictions as a function of sleeve/perforation cluster spacing, treatment size, proppant type, mesh size, and pump rate. Implications for implementation of a certain treatment and completion design are discussed in detail.","PeriodicalId":103693,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, February 06, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194350-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

As the Powder River Basin (PRB) development continues and more wells are drilled, identifying best completion practices is critical to economic success. This operator has completed several Turner horizontal wells drilled at 10,300-11,000 ft TVD using crosslinked gel with encouraging results. Although reservoir quality varies in the basin, the Turner interval is more than 30 ft thick in the area of interest (AOI) in Campbell County, Wyoming. In this area, production history matched permeability ranges from 0.005 to 0.1 mD, with pore pressure gradient from 0.55 to 0.64 psi/ft. Fracture modeling and production history matching/sensitivities were performed on a few horizontal wells. This paper discusses the results of this modeling and history matching, and it summarizes the evolution of Turner Formation fracture treatment designs, that were done by one operator to maximize the return on investment. The operator collected core data, open hole logs, and Diagnostic Fracture Injection Test (DFIT) data. The objectives of this study were to: a) determine reservoir parameters from DFIT, b) estimate fracture height growth, fracture half-length, and conductivity for Turner crosslinked gel fracs, c) determine the most appropriate perforation cluster or fracture spacing, as well as treatment rate, fluid/proppant loading, and proppant types/sizes based on the expected long-term production performance, d) compare the estimated production of cemented sleeve vs. plug-and-perf completions, and e) perform multivariate analysis of public production and completion data to compare with the detailed physical modeling. The results presented in this paper show well-performance predictions as a function of sleeve/perforation cluster spacing, treatment size, proppant type, mesh size, and pump rate. Implications for implementation of a certain treatment and completion design are discussed in detail.
改进完井设计以优化Powder River盆地低渗透特纳砂岩油藏的产能——一份作业者的经验
随着Powder River盆地(PRB)开发的持续进行,钻井数量越来越多,确定最佳完井方法对经济成功至关重要。该作业者已经使用交联凝胶完成了几口TVD为10300 - 11000英尺的特纳水平井,取得了令人鼓舞的效果。尽管盆地内的储层质量各不相同,但在怀俄明州坎贝尔县的感兴趣区域(AOI),特纳层厚超过30英尺。该地区的生产历史与渗透率的匹配范围为0.005 ~ 0.1 mD,孔隙压力梯度为0.55 ~ 0.64 psi/ft。在几口水平井上进行了裂缝建模和生产历史匹配/灵敏度分析。本文讨论了建模和历史匹配的结果,并总结了特纳地层压裂设计的演变,这些设计由一家运营商完成,以实现投资回报最大化。作业者收集了岩心数据、裸眼测井数据和诊断裂缝注入测试(DFIT)数据。本研究的目的是:a)根据DFIT确定储层参数,b)估计特纳交联凝胶裂缝的裂缝高度增长、裂缝半长和导流能力,c)根据预期的长期生产性能确定最合适的射孔簇或裂缝间距,以及处理速率、流体/支撑剂载荷和支撑剂类型/尺寸,d)比较胶结滑套与桥塞射孔完井的估计产量。e)对公共生产和完井数据进行多变量分析,与详细的物理建模进行对比。本文给出的结果表明,井筒性能预测是滑套/射孔簇间距、处理尺寸、支撑剂类型、网孔尺寸和泵速的函数。详细讨论了对特定处理和完井设计实施的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信