User Education: The Next Major Thrust in Information Science?.

F. W. Lancaster
{"title":"User Education: The Next Major Thrust in Information Science?.","authors":"F. W. Lancaster","doi":"10.2307/40322099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE PROBLEMS of information retrieval, both for retrospective search and current awareness purposes, are becoming more acute as knowledge increases in extension and intension, as the number of practicing scientists and technologists multiplies, and as the published literature grows in volume. These problems are now widely recognized in all segments of the scientific and technical community: the universities, government, and private industry. To help alleviate these problems, millions of dollars have been spent by the federal government in research on information retrieval -and in the design and operation of information centers and services. It is extremely unfortunate, therefore, that, as a number of recent studies have convincingly demonstrated, large segments of the scientific and technical community do not make use of national information services and, indeed, are largely unaware of the existence of these resources.1* 2> 3 This is true not only of on-demand services such as retrospective search, but also of widely-available published bibliographic products. Earlier studies (e.g., by Martyn4) have revealed that librarians and other information specialists are consulted comparatively little by research scientists in the course of their information gathering. Some scientists and technologists, while aware of the existence of information services, do not use them because of misconceptions relating to their","PeriodicalId":256869,"journal":{"name":"Journal of education for librarianship","volume":"210 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of education for librarianship","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/40322099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

THE PROBLEMS of information retrieval, both for retrospective search and current awareness purposes, are becoming more acute as knowledge increases in extension and intension, as the number of practicing scientists and technologists multiplies, and as the published literature grows in volume. These problems are now widely recognized in all segments of the scientific and technical community: the universities, government, and private industry. To help alleviate these problems, millions of dollars have been spent by the federal government in research on information retrieval -and in the design and operation of information centers and services. It is extremely unfortunate, therefore, that, as a number of recent studies have convincingly demonstrated, large segments of the scientific and technical community do not make use of national information services and, indeed, are largely unaware of the existence of these resources.1* 2> 3 This is true not only of on-demand services such as retrospective search, but also of widely-available published bibliographic products. Earlier studies (e.g., by Martyn4) have revealed that librarians and other information specialists are consulted comparatively little by research scientists in the course of their information gathering. Some scientists and technologists, while aware of the existence of information services, do not use them because of misconceptions relating to their
用户教育:信息科学的下一个主要推动力?
随着知识的扩展和内涵的增加,随着实践科学家和技术专家的数量的增加,以及随着已发表文献的数量的增加,信息检索的问题,无论是为了回顾性搜索还是为了当前的认识,都变得越来越尖锐。这些问题现在在科学和技术界的所有部门都得到了广泛的认识:大学、政府和私营企业。为了帮助缓解这些问题,联邦政府已经在信息检索研究以及信息中心和服务的设计和运作上花费了数百万美元。因此,极为不幸的是,正如最近的一些研究令人信服地表明的那样,科学和技术界的大部分人不利用国家信息服务,而且实际上基本上不知道这些资源的存在。这不仅适用于诸如回顾性检索之类的按需服务,也适用于广泛提供的出版书目产品。早期的研究(如Martyn4的研究)表明,研究科学家在收集信息的过程中很少咨询图书馆员和其他信息专家。一些科学家和技术人员虽然知道信息服务的存在,但由于对信息服务的误解而不使用它们
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信