Comparative Study of Design of Over Head Water Tanks for Capacity of 100 kL to 300 kL using Recent Past IS 3370

M. Chandra, Rajendra Kumar Baghel, N. Binnani
{"title":"Comparative Study of Design of Over Head Water Tanks for Capacity of 100 kL to 300 kL using Recent Past IS 3370","authors":"M. Chandra, Rajendra Kumar Baghel, N. Binnani","doi":"10.46610/jorais.2022.v07i02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An elevated reservoir is mostly used to store, liquid products like water, petroleum, and other types of chemicals, which require some static head to provide kinetic energy for flow. Except for the durability aspect, design load calculation of various reservoirs is similar regardless of the chemical aggressiveness. In general, water-retaining structures have been designed as crack-free structure to avoid any sort of outflow. As per the observation from the field, the overhead water tanks were designed continuously using the old Indian Standard codes (IS 3370: 1965 (Part 1 to 2), IS 1893: 1984 (Part 1) and IS 875: 1987 (Part 3)). In order to understand the variation in design due to amendments in Indian Standard (IS 3370: 2021 (Part-1 to 2), IS 1893: 2014 (Part-2), IS 875: 2015 (Part-3) in past few years, it is necessary to do comparative study of design of elevated reservoirs for different capacity. This study is an attempt to compare the design provisions based on different design philosophies i.e. WSM (IS: 3370 (1965) and LSM (IS: 3370 (2021). In this paper, variation in reinforcement quantity in different elements of double domed elevated reservoir has been estimated for 100 kL to 300 kL capacity for seismic zone-III and for wind speed 39 m/sec. A design program has been prepared for the design calculations of overhead water tanks using MS excel for different capacity and distinctive IS codal provisions. Comparison of results using different design philosophies has raised the need for retrofitting of various elements of existing water tanks.","PeriodicalId":206064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Recent Activities in Infrastructure Science","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Recent Activities in Infrastructure Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46610/jorais.2022.v07i02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An elevated reservoir is mostly used to store, liquid products like water, petroleum, and other types of chemicals, which require some static head to provide kinetic energy for flow. Except for the durability aspect, design load calculation of various reservoirs is similar regardless of the chemical aggressiveness. In general, water-retaining structures have been designed as crack-free structure to avoid any sort of outflow. As per the observation from the field, the overhead water tanks were designed continuously using the old Indian Standard codes (IS 3370: 1965 (Part 1 to 2), IS 1893: 1984 (Part 1) and IS 875: 1987 (Part 3)). In order to understand the variation in design due to amendments in Indian Standard (IS 3370: 2021 (Part-1 to 2), IS 1893: 2014 (Part-2), IS 875: 2015 (Part-3) in past few years, it is necessary to do comparative study of design of elevated reservoirs for different capacity. This study is an attempt to compare the design provisions based on different design philosophies i.e. WSM (IS: 3370 (1965) and LSM (IS: 3370 (2021). In this paper, variation in reinforcement quantity in different elements of double domed elevated reservoir has been estimated for 100 kL to 300 kL capacity for seismic zone-III and for wind speed 39 m/sec. A design program has been prepared for the design calculations of overhead water tanks using MS excel for different capacity and distinctive IS codal provisions. Comparison of results using different design philosophies has raised the need for retrofitting of various elements of existing water tanks.
100kl与300kl容量上水罐设计的比较研究
高架储层主要用于储存液体产品,如水、石油和其他类型的化学品,这些产品需要一些静态水头为流动提供动能。除耐久性方面外,无论化学侵蚀性如何,各种水库的设计荷载计算是相似的。一般来说,挡水结构被设计成无裂缝结构,以避免任何形式的流出。根据现场观察,架空水箱的设计一直使用旧的印度标准代码(IS 3370: 1965(第1至2部分),IS 1893: 1984(第1部分)和IS 875: 1987(第3部分))。为了了解近年来印度标准(IS 3370: 2021 (part 1 -2)、IS 1893: 2014 (part 2)、IS 875: 2015 (part 3))的修订所导致的设计变化,有必要对不同容量的高架水库设计进行比较研究。本研究试图比较基于不同设计理念的设计条款,即WSM (is: 3370(1965)和LSM (is: 3370(2021))。本文估计了双穹顶高架水库在震区容量为100 ~ 300 kL、风速为39 m/sec条件下不同单元配筋量的变化。利用MS excel软件编制了针对不同容量和不同IS代码规定的架空水箱的设计计算程序。使用不同设计理念的结果的比较提出了对现有水箱的各种元素进行改造的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信