Contribution of life course cardiovascular risk factors to racial disparities in dementia incidence

E. Ferguson, E. Vittinghoff, A. Zeki Al Hazzouri, N. Allen, A. Fitzpatrick, K. Yaffe
{"title":"Contribution of life course cardiovascular risk factors to racial disparities in dementia incidence","authors":"E. Ferguson, E. Vittinghoff, A. Zeki Al Hazzouri, N. Allen, A. Fitzpatrick, K. Yaffe","doi":"10.3389/frdem.2023.1215904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Racial disparities in dementia outcomes persist in the United States. Targeting modifiable risk factors, including cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs), is a conceivable way to reduce health disparities. Life course CVRFs are often higher in non-White adults and are associated with risk of dementia, but it is unknown whether they contribute to racial disparities in dementia and cognition. Methods Using a pooled cohort of 4,159 White and 939 Black participants aged 65–95 years, we conducted a mediation analysis to estimate the proportional effect of race on dementia that is explained by four CVRFs imputed over the life course (20–49, 50–69, and 70–89 years of age): body mass index, fasting glucose, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Results Compared to White participants, Black participants had greater risk of dementia (adjusted OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.17–1.60). BMI and fasting glucose over the life course were significant mediators of the effect of race on dementia risk, mediating 39.1% (95% CI: 10.5–67.8%) and 8.2% (95% CI: 0.1–16.2%) of the effect, adjusted for sex and age. All four CVRFs together were also significant mediators of the effect of race on scores on global cognition and processing speed, accounting for approximately 11% of the effect. Conclusions We found that CVRFs across the life course partially explain disparities in dementia risk and cognition in late-life. Improved prevention and treatment of CVRFs across the life course may be important to reduce health disparities for dementia.","PeriodicalId":408305,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dementia","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dementia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frdem.2023.1215904","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Racial disparities in dementia outcomes persist in the United States. Targeting modifiable risk factors, including cardiovascular risk factors (CVRFs), is a conceivable way to reduce health disparities. Life course CVRFs are often higher in non-White adults and are associated with risk of dementia, but it is unknown whether they contribute to racial disparities in dementia and cognition. Methods Using a pooled cohort of 4,159 White and 939 Black participants aged 65–95 years, we conducted a mediation analysis to estimate the proportional effect of race on dementia that is explained by four CVRFs imputed over the life course (20–49, 50–69, and 70–89 years of age): body mass index, fasting glucose, systolic blood pressure, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Results Compared to White participants, Black participants had greater risk of dementia (adjusted OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.17–1.60). BMI and fasting glucose over the life course were significant mediators of the effect of race on dementia risk, mediating 39.1% (95% CI: 10.5–67.8%) and 8.2% (95% CI: 0.1–16.2%) of the effect, adjusted for sex and age. All four CVRFs together were also significant mediators of the effect of race on scores on global cognition and processing speed, accounting for approximately 11% of the effect. Conclusions We found that CVRFs across the life course partially explain disparities in dementia risk and cognition in late-life. Improved prevention and treatment of CVRFs across the life course may be important to reduce health disparities for dementia.
生命历程心血管危险因素对痴呆发病率种族差异的贡献
背景:在美国,痴呆症预后的种族差异仍然存在。针对可改变的风险因素,包括心血管风险因素(CVRFs),是减少健康差距的一种可行方法。生命周期cvrf在非白人成年人中通常较高,并与痴呆风险相关,但尚不清楚它们是否会导致痴呆和认知方面的种族差异。方法采用年龄在65-95岁之间的4159名白人和939名黑人的合并队列,我们进行了一项中介分析,以估计种族对痴呆的比例影响,这是由生命过程(20-49岁、50-69岁和70-89岁)中输入的四个cvrf来解释的:体重指数、空腹血糖、收缩压和低密度脂蛋白胆固醇。结果与白人受试者相比,黑人受试者有更高的痴呆风险(调整OR = 1.37;95% ci: 1.17-1.60)。在整个生命过程中,BMI和空腹血糖是种族对痴呆风险影响的重要中介,经性别和年龄调整后,分别介导39.1% (95% CI: 10.5-67.8%)和8.2% (95% CI: 0.1-16.2%)的影响。所有四个cvrf加起来也是种族对整体认知和处理速度得分影响的显著中介,约占影响的11%。我们发现整个生命过程中的cvrf部分解释了老年痴呆风险和认知的差异。在整个生命过程中改善cvrf的预防和治疗对于减少痴呆症的健康差异可能很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信