Assessment of fieldwork practice: The student experience

Judith Knight
{"title":"Assessment of fieldwork practice: The student experience","authors":"Judith Knight","doi":"10.1921/17466105.5.1.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of fieldwork is common to all occupational therapy courses. This form of competency based assessment has been researched across many healthcare professions. Work on the appraisal of fieldwork assessments used by occupational therapy courses in the United Kingdom is just beginning. At the present time there appears a gap in information concerning the experience of fieldwork assessment from the student's perspective. This article seeks to address this by reporting the findings of a qualitative study of third year undergraduate occupational therapy students at University College Northampton to investigate their experience of being assessed on fieldwork. The results showed that students expressed high levels of acceptance with the primary fieldwork assessment, the fieldwork profile. However they displayed some concern about its reliability. A major influence on the assessment process was seen to be the fieldwork educator and the supervisory relationship. In general older students appeared to have a greater degree of control over both the assessment process and the supervisory relationship. As a result of the study it would appear that a national exploration of the assessments used to assess competence of occupational therapy graduates could be beneficial to the profession.","PeriodicalId":446723,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practice teaching & learning","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practice teaching & learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1921/17466105.5.1.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Assessment of fieldwork is common to all occupational therapy courses. This form of competency based assessment has been researched across many healthcare professions. Work on the appraisal of fieldwork assessments used by occupational therapy courses in the United Kingdom is just beginning. At the present time there appears a gap in information concerning the experience of fieldwork assessment from the student's perspective. This article seeks to address this by reporting the findings of a qualitative study of third year undergraduate occupational therapy students at University College Northampton to investigate their experience of being assessed on fieldwork. The results showed that students expressed high levels of acceptance with the primary fieldwork assessment, the fieldwork profile. However they displayed some concern about its reliability. A major influence on the assessment process was seen to be the fieldwork educator and the supervisory relationship. In general older students appeared to have a greater degree of control over both the assessment process and the supervisory relationship. As a result of the study it would appear that a national exploration of the assessments used to assess competence of occupational therapy graduates could be beneficial to the profession.
实地实习评估:学生经验
实地工作评估是所有职业治疗课程的共同内容。这种基于能力的评估形式已经在许多医疗保健专业中进行了研究。英国职业治疗课程使用的实地工作评估工作才刚刚开始。目前,从学生的角度来看,有关实地考察经验的信息存在空白。本文试图通过报告对北安普顿大学职业治疗专业三年级本科生进行定性研究的结果来解决这一问题,调查他们在实地工作中被评估的经历。结果显示,学生对主要的田野工作评估,即田野工作概况表达了高水平的接受度。然而,他们对它的可靠性表示了一些担忧。对评估过程的主要影响被认为是实地工作教育者和监督关系。一般来说,年龄较大的学生似乎对评估过程和监督关系都有更大程度的控制。这项研究的结果表明,在全国范围内探索用于评估职业治疗毕业生能力的评估方法,可能对职业治疗有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信