{"title":"“The Damnable Dilemma”: African-American Accommodation and Protest during World War I","authors":"W. B. Jordan","doi":"10.2307/2081649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the summer of 1918, a controversial editorial appeared in the Crisis, the monthly journal of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). \"Close Ranks\" by W. E. B. Du Bois, the journal's editor and the nation's leading spokesman for equal rights, advised blacks to stop agitating for equality for the duration of World War I. \"Let us, while this war lasts, forget our special grievances and close our ranks shoulder to shoulder with our white fellow citizens and the allied nations that are fighting for democracy,\" Du Bois wrote.' The editorial dismayed many blacks who had come to see Du Bois as the nation's leading black militant. When they learned that the army had offered him a captaincy, some believed he had, in effect, accepted a bribe. Only recently have historians challenged Du Bois's explanation that the editorial was written before he knew of the army's offer and that the two were unrelated.2 David Levering Lewis's 1993 biography asserts that Du Bois \"struck a deal\" with the army to write \"Close Ranks\" in exchange for the captaincy. This interpretation was first and most thoroughly presented by Mark Ellis, who based his conclusions on two arguments. First, using previously classified government records, Ellis showed that Du Bois probably drafted \"Close Ranks\" after he was offered the captaincy. Second, he asserted that the editorial \"did not square\" with Du Bois's \"known rejection of accommodationism.\"3","PeriodicalId":396317,"journal":{"name":"Race and U.S. Foreign Policy from 1900 through World War II","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Race and U.S. Foreign Policy from 1900 through World War II","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/2081649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
Abstract
In the summer of 1918, a controversial editorial appeared in the Crisis, the monthly journal of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP). "Close Ranks" by W. E. B. Du Bois, the journal's editor and the nation's leading spokesman for equal rights, advised blacks to stop agitating for equality for the duration of World War I. "Let us, while this war lasts, forget our special grievances and close our ranks shoulder to shoulder with our white fellow citizens and the allied nations that are fighting for democracy," Du Bois wrote.' The editorial dismayed many blacks who had come to see Du Bois as the nation's leading black militant. When they learned that the army had offered him a captaincy, some believed he had, in effect, accepted a bribe. Only recently have historians challenged Du Bois's explanation that the editorial was written before he knew of the army's offer and that the two were unrelated.2 David Levering Lewis's 1993 biography asserts that Du Bois "struck a deal" with the army to write "Close Ranks" in exchange for the captaincy. This interpretation was first and most thoroughly presented by Mark Ellis, who based his conclusions on two arguments. First, using previously classified government records, Ellis showed that Du Bois probably drafted "Close Ranks" after he was offered the captaincy. Second, he asserted that the editorial "did not square" with Du Bois's "known rejection of accommodationism."3
1918年夏天,全国有色人种协进会(NAACP)的月刊《危机》(Crisis)刊登了一篇有争议的社论。杜波依斯(W. E. B. Du Bois)的《紧密团结》(Close Ranks)建议黑人在第一次世界大战期间停止为平等而煽动。杜波依斯是该杂志的主编,也是美国倡导平等权利的主要发言人。杜波依斯写道:“在这场战争持续期间,让我们忘记我们的特殊不满,与我们的白人同胞和为民主而战的盟国并肩作战。”这篇社论让许多黑人感到失望,他们把杜波依斯视为美国黑人武装领袖。当他们得知军队任命他为上尉时,一些人认为他实际上是接受了贿赂。直到最近,历史学家才对杜波依斯的解释提出质疑,他认为这篇社论是在他知道军方的提议之前写的,而且这两篇社论没有关系大卫·利弗林·刘易斯在1993年的传记中断言,杜波依斯与军队“达成了一项协议”,写了《紧密的队伍》,以换取队长的职位。这种解释最早也是最彻底地由马克·埃利斯提出,他的结论基于两个论点。首先,埃利斯利用先前的政府机密记录表明,杜波依斯很可能是在被任命为队长后才起草了《紧密团结》一书。其次,他断言这篇社论“不符合”杜波依斯“众所周知的拒绝迁就主义”。3.