Traumatic Dislocation of the Proximal Tibiofibular Joint: A Systematic Review and 10-year Experience From a Level 1 Trauma Center

P. Rajan, David E. Ramski, N. Romeo
{"title":"Traumatic Dislocation of the Proximal Tibiofibular Joint: A Systematic Review and 10-year Experience From a Level 1 Trauma Center","authors":"P. Rajan, David E. Ramski, N. Romeo","doi":"10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Traumatic proximal tibiofibular joint dislocations occur infrequently and are typically the result of high-energy trauma. These injuries can be a marker of limb injury severity because patients often sustain vascular injury and are at high risk of amputation. The purpose of this study was to present a systematic review of traumatic proximal tibiofibular joint dislocations and compare rates of associated injuries with a retrospective series of patients at a level 1 trauma center. The secondary objective was to report rates and clinical predictors of limb amputation. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, identifying three studies meeting eligibility criteria. A retrospective chart review was conducted identifying 17 skeletally mature patients with proximal tibiofibular dislocation treated from January 2010 to February 2021. A chart review extracted patient demographics, fracture patterns, open fracture, preoprative and postoperative peroneal nerve injury, vascular injury, and amputation. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify clinical predictors of outcomes. Results: Sixteen of 17 proximal tibiofibular injuries (94.1%) were associated with fracture, most commonly tibial shaft (n = 11, 68.75%). Twelve of 17 fractures (76.5%) were open. Five vascular injuries (29.4%) occurred requiring surgical intervention. Seven (41.2%) preoperative peroneal nerve deficits were noted; six had persistent deficits postoperatively or underwent amputation (average follow-up 31.3 ± 32.6 months). Two patients in the sample without preoperative peroneal nerve deficits were noted to exhibit them after fixation. Eight patients (47%) underwent an amputation, 7 (87.5%) of whom had an open fracture and 4 (50%) of whom had documented vascular injury. Discussion: Traumatic proximal tibiofibular fractures indicate severe injury to the lower extremity with high risk for nerve injury and possible amputation. Patients who present with vascular injury and open fracture in association with proximal tibiofibular joint disruption may be at elevated risk of amputation.","PeriodicalId":145112,"journal":{"name":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAAOS Global Research & Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Traumatic proximal tibiofibular joint dislocations occur infrequently and are typically the result of high-energy trauma. These injuries can be a marker of limb injury severity because patients often sustain vascular injury and are at high risk of amputation. The purpose of this study was to present a systematic review of traumatic proximal tibiofibular joint dislocations and compare rates of associated injuries with a retrospective series of patients at a level 1 trauma center. The secondary objective was to report rates and clinical predictors of limb amputation. Methods: A systematic review was conducted, identifying three studies meeting eligibility criteria. A retrospective chart review was conducted identifying 17 skeletally mature patients with proximal tibiofibular dislocation treated from January 2010 to February 2021. A chart review extracted patient demographics, fracture patterns, open fracture, preoprative and postoperative peroneal nerve injury, vascular injury, and amputation. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify clinical predictors of outcomes. Results: Sixteen of 17 proximal tibiofibular injuries (94.1%) were associated with fracture, most commonly tibial shaft (n = 11, 68.75%). Twelve of 17 fractures (76.5%) were open. Five vascular injuries (29.4%) occurred requiring surgical intervention. Seven (41.2%) preoperative peroneal nerve deficits were noted; six had persistent deficits postoperatively or underwent amputation (average follow-up 31.3 ± 32.6 months). Two patients in the sample without preoperative peroneal nerve deficits were noted to exhibit them after fixation. Eight patients (47%) underwent an amputation, 7 (87.5%) of whom had an open fracture and 4 (50%) of whom had documented vascular injury. Discussion: Traumatic proximal tibiofibular fractures indicate severe injury to the lower extremity with high risk for nerve injury and possible amputation. Patients who present with vascular injury and open fracture in association with proximal tibiofibular joint disruption may be at elevated risk of amputation.
外伤性胫腓骨近端关节脱位:1级创伤中心的系统回顾和10年经验
外伤性胫腓近端关节脱位并不常见,通常是高能创伤的结果。这些损伤可以作为肢体损伤严重程度的标志,因为患者通常会维持血管损伤,并且截肢的风险很高。本研究的目的是对外伤性胫腓骨近端关节脱位进行系统回顾,并与1级创伤中心回顾性系列患者的相关损伤率进行比较。次要目的是报告截肢率和临床预测因素。方法:进行系统评价,确定三个符合入选标准的研究。对2010年1月至2021年2月期间接受治疗的17例骨骼成熟的胫腓骨近端脱位患者进行回顾性分析。一份图表综述提取了患者的人口统计资料、骨折类型、开放性骨折、术前和术后腓神经损伤、血管损伤和截肢。采用二元logistic回归分析确定预后的临床预测因素。结果:17例胫腓骨近端损伤中16例(94.1%)合并骨折,以胫干骨折最为常见(n = 11, 68.75%)。17例骨折中有12例(76.5%)为开放性骨折。5例血管损伤(29.4%)需要手术治疗。术前腓骨神经缺损7例(41.2%);6例术后持续存在缺陷或截肢(平均随访31.3±32.6个月)。2例术前无腓神经缺损的患者在固定后出现腓神经缺损。8例患者(47%)接受了截肢,其中7例(87.5%)有开放性骨折,4例(50%)有血管损伤。讨论:外伤性胫腓近端骨折表明下肢严重损伤,神经损伤和可能截肢的风险很高。出现血管损伤和开放性骨折并胫腓骨近端关节断裂的患者可能有较高的截肢风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信