Resolution, Sidelobe, and Contrast Analysis of Ultrasound Fourier Based High Frame Rate Imaging

Zhaohui Wang
{"title":"Resolution, Sidelobe, and Contrast Analysis of Ultrasound Fourier Based High Frame Rate Imaging","authors":"Zhaohui Wang","doi":"10.1109/ISSPIT51521.2020.9408713","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, a variable frame rate imaging method based on Fourier transformation has been developed to increase resolution and reduce sidelobe. Experiments with the imaging methods including D&S, 1-angle HFR (HFR 1), 11-angle HFR (HFR 11), 19-angle HFR (HFR 19), and 91-angle HFR (HFR 91) have also been carried out. In the experiment, one linear array was used to construct 2D B-mode images for a tissue-equivalent phantom and pointer scatterer. The array had a center frequency of 2.5MHz, dimensions of 19.2mm×14mm, and 128 elements. The experiments on the resolution and sidelobe were done with pointer scatterer in the water tank. Results show that HFR 11, HFR 19, and HFR 91 have higher resolution than D&S at all depths. The sidelobe for HFR 1, HFR 11, HFR 19, D&S, and HFR 91 decreases in turn, and HFR 91 has the lowest sidelobe. The experiments on the contrast comparison between HFR and D&S method are made on one tissue-equivalent phantom, eight cones with different contrasts (−15dB, −10dB, −5dB, −2dB, 2dB, 4dB, 7.5dB and 12dB) over background. The contrast curves of eight cones for HFR 1, HFR 11, HFR 19, D&S, and HFR 91 shift downward in turn, which is compatible with their sidelobe property. The contrast recognition accuracy of HFR 91 is the best. All evaluation standards show that the high frame rate imaging method is better than the conventional delay and sum method if their frame rates are the same, so high resolution and low-sidelobe images can be constructed at a high frame rate with this Fourier method.","PeriodicalId":111385,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISSPIT51521.2020.9408713","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recently, a variable frame rate imaging method based on Fourier transformation has been developed to increase resolution and reduce sidelobe. Experiments with the imaging methods including D&S, 1-angle HFR (HFR 1), 11-angle HFR (HFR 11), 19-angle HFR (HFR 19), and 91-angle HFR (HFR 91) have also been carried out. In the experiment, one linear array was used to construct 2D B-mode images for a tissue-equivalent phantom and pointer scatterer. The array had a center frequency of 2.5MHz, dimensions of 19.2mm×14mm, and 128 elements. The experiments on the resolution and sidelobe were done with pointer scatterer in the water tank. Results show that HFR 11, HFR 19, and HFR 91 have higher resolution than D&S at all depths. The sidelobe for HFR 1, HFR 11, HFR 19, D&S, and HFR 91 decreases in turn, and HFR 91 has the lowest sidelobe. The experiments on the contrast comparison between HFR and D&S method are made on one tissue-equivalent phantom, eight cones with different contrasts (−15dB, −10dB, −5dB, −2dB, 2dB, 4dB, 7.5dB and 12dB) over background. The contrast curves of eight cones for HFR 1, HFR 11, HFR 19, D&S, and HFR 91 shift downward in turn, which is compatible with their sidelobe property. The contrast recognition accuracy of HFR 91 is the best. All evaluation standards show that the high frame rate imaging method is better than the conventional delay and sum method if their frame rates are the same, so high resolution and low-sidelobe images can be constructed at a high frame rate with this Fourier method.
基于超声傅里叶高帧率成像的分辨率、旁瓣和对比度分析
近年来,人们提出了一种基于傅里叶变换的变帧率成像方法,以提高图像的分辨率和降低副瓣。采用D&S、1角HFR (HFR 1)、11角HFR (HFR 11)、19角HFR (HFR 19)、91角HFR (HFR 91)等成像方法进行了实验。实验中,采用线性阵列对组织等效幻体和指针散射体进行二维b模成像。该阵列中心频率为2.5MHz,尺寸为19.2mm×14mm,单元数为128个。利用指针散射体在水箱中进行了分辨力和旁瓣实验。结果表明,HFR 11、HFR 19和HFR 91在各深度的分辨率均高于D&S。HFR 1、HFR 11、HFR 19、D&S和HFR 91的旁瓣依次降低,其中HFR 91的旁瓣最低。在一个组织等效幻像、8个不同背景对比度(- 15dB、- 10dB、- 5dB、- 2dB、2dB、4dB、7.5dB和12dB)的锥体上进行了HFR和D&S方法对比实验。HFR 1、HFR 11、HFR 19、D&S和HFR 91的8个视锥的对比度曲线依次向下偏移,这与它们的旁瓣特性相适应。hfr91的对比度识别精度最好。所有评价标准都表明,在帧率相同的情况下,高帧率成像方法优于传统的延迟和和成像方法,因此可以在高帧率下构建高分辨率、低旁瓣的图像。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信