Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan

Sonam Dorji Layrab Layrab
{"title":"Livestock Depredation and Its Impact on Farmers in Trongsa District, Bhutan","authors":"Sonam Dorji Layrab Layrab","doi":"10.47540/ijsei.v4i2.974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This survey was conducted in the Trongsa District of Bhutan to assess and document the depredation of livestock by wild predators, time, and seasonality of predation, estimate the economic value of livestock losses in three years (2019-2021), and assess farmers’ perception of livestock depredation. A survey using a semi-structured questionnaire was done with 218 farming households from five subdistricts of Trongsa, Bhutan. From a total of 683 livestock kills recorded, the tiger (69.69%) killed more than the dhole (14.4%), leopard (13.7%), and bear (1.4%) in the last three years. Adult cattle (milch, Dry & Bull) were more vulnerable (n=496) compared to young (calf & heifer) cattle (n=169). The majority of predation was in summer (51.18%) and winter (23.62%) whereas the rests (25.19%) were believed to have occurred irrespective of seasons. The total loss of 683 livestock head was valued at 380,739.13$ of which the majority were cattle (n= 665, 345,219.69$) followed by yak (n=48, 35,032.87$). Each household on average lost approximately 23.8% of the annual household cash income in the last three years and only 13% (n=30) received some form of compensation. The majority of respondents (96.8%) attribute a current increase in depredation cases to wildlife conservation efforts such as strict conservation laws, protected areas, and biological corridors. We recommend livestock intensification programs such as pasture improvements in fallow lands and financial compensations for the loss of improved breeds as short-term measures. We recommend for enhanced discussion on livestock insurance schemes and involve farmers in managing human-wildlife conflicts.","PeriodicalId":277026,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues (IJSEI)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of Social and Environmental Issues (IJSEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47540/ijsei.v4i2.974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This survey was conducted in the Trongsa District of Bhutan to assess and document the depredation of livestock by wild predators, time, and seasonality of predation, estimate the economic value of livestock losses in three years (2019-2021), and assess farmers’ perception of livestock depredation. A survey using a semi-structured questionnaire was done with 218 farming households from five subdistricts of Trongsa, Bhutan. From a total of 683 livestock kills recorded, the tiger (69.69%) killed more than the dhole (14.4%), leopard (13.7%), and bear (1.4%) in the last three years. Adult cattle (milch, Dry & Bull) were more vulnerable (n=496) compared to young (calf & heifer) cattle (n=169). The majority of predation was in summer (51.18%) and winter (23.62%) whereas the rests (25.19%) were believed to have occurred irrespective of seasons. The total loss of 683 livestock head was valued at 380,739.13$ of which the majority were cattle (n= 665, 345,219.69$) followed by yak (n=48, 35,032.87$). Each household on average lost approximately 23.8% of the annual household cash income in the last three years and only 13% (n=30) received some form of compensation. The majority of respondents (96.8%) attribute a current increase in depredation cases to wildlife conservation efforts such as strict conservation laws, protected areas, and biological corridors. We recommend livestock intensification programs such as pasture improvements in fallow lands and financial compensations for the loss of improved breeds as short-term measures. We recommend for enhanced discussion on livestock insurance schemes and involve farmers in managing human-wildlife conflicts.
不丹Trongsa地区的牲畜掠夺及其对农民的影响
该调查在不丹的Trongsa地区进行,旨在评估和记录野生捕食者对牲畜的掠夺、掠夺时间和季节性,估计三年内(2019-2021年)牲畜损失的经济价值,并评估农民对牲畜掠夺的看法。采用半结构化问卷对不丹Trongsa五个街道的218户农户进行了调查。在过去三年中,老虎(69.69%)杀死的牲畜总数超过了老虎(14.4%)、豹子(13.7%)和熊(1.4%)。与幼牛(小牛和小母牛)(n=169)相比,成年牛(乳牛、干牛和公牛)更脆弱(n=496)。多数捕食发生在夏季(51.18%)和冬季(23.62%),其余捕食发生在不同季节(25.19%)。牲畜总损失683头,价值380,739.13美元,其中以牛(n= 665, 345,219.69美元)为主,其次是牦牛(n=48, 35,032.87美元)。在过去三年中,每个家庭平均损失了大约23.8%的家庭年现金收入,只有13% (n=30)获得了某种形式的补偿。大多数受访者(96.8%)将当前掠夺案件的增加归因于野生动物保护工作,如严格的保护法、保护区和生物走廊。我们建议将畜牧业集约化方案作为短期措施,如休耕地的牧场改良和对良种损失的经济补偿。我们建议加强对牲畜保险计划的讨论,并让农民参与管理人类与野生动物的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信