Software Faults Emulation at Model-Level: Towards Automated Software FMEA

V. Bonfiglio, Leonardo Montecchi, Ivano Irrera, Francesco Rossi, P. Lollini, A. Bondavalli
{"title":"Software Faults Emulation at Model-Level: Towards Automated Software FMEA","authors":"V. Bonfiglio, Leonardo Montecchi, Ivano Irrera, Francesco Rossi, P. Lollini, A. Bondavalli","doi":"10.1109/DSN-W.2015.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Safety is a fundamental property for a wide class of systems, which can be assessed through safety analysis. Recent standards, as the ISO26262 for the automotive domain, recommend safety analysis processes to be performed at system, hardware, and software levels. While Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a well-known technique for safety assessment at system level, its application at software level is still an open problem, especially concerning its integration into certification processes. Fault injection has been envisioned as a viable approach for performing Software-FMEA (SW-FMEA), but it typically requires an advanced development stage where code is available. The approach we propose in this paper, aims to perform software fault injection at model-level, namely on fUML-ALF models obtained from a component-based UML description through transformations proposed in a previous work. Model-level fault injection allows SW-FMEA to assess the effectiveness of safety mechanisms from the early stages of system design. The work in this paper focuses on how the software fault injection is implemented, and on the study of fault propagation through appropriate points of observation to highlight possible violations of requirements, with the identification critical paths.","PeriodicalId":202329,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DSN-W.2015.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Safety is a fundamental property for a wide class of systems, which can be assessed through safety analysis. Recent standards, as the ISO26262 for the automotive domain, recommend safety analysis processes to be performed at system, hardware, and software levels. While Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a well-known technique for safety assessment at system level, its application at software level is still an open problem, especially concerning its integration into certification processes. Fault injection has been envisioned as a viable approach for performing Software-FMEA (SW-FMEA), but it typically requires an advanced development stage where code is available. The approach we propose in this paper, aims to perform software fault injection at model-level, namely on fUML-ALF models obtained from a component-based UML description through transformations proposed in a previous work. Model-level fault injection allows SW-FMEA to assess the effectiveness of safety mechanisms from the early stages of system design. The work in this paper focuses on how the software fault injection is implemented, and on the study of fault propagation through appropriate points of observation to highlight possible violations of requirements, with the identification critical paths.
模型级软件故障仿真:迈向自动化软件FMEA
安全性是一大类系统的基本属性,可以通过安全分析来评估。最近的标准,如汽车领域的ISO26262,建议在系统、硬件和软件级别执行安全分析过程。失效模式和影响分析(FMEA)是一种众所周知的系统级安全评估技术,但其在软件级的应用仍然是一个开放的问题,特别是如何将其集成到认证过程中。故障注入被认为是执行Software-FMEA (SW-FMEA)的一种可行方法,但它通常需要在代码可用的高级开发阶段。我们在本文中提出的方法,旨在在模型级执行软件故障注入,即在通过先前工作中提出的转换从基于组件的UML描述中获得的mf - alf模型上。模型级故障注入允许SW-FMEA从系统设计的早期阶段评估安全机制的有效性。本文的工作重点是如何实现软件故障注入,以及通过适当的观察点来研究故障传播,以突出可能的需求违反,并识别关键路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信