Further Analysis on the Evaluation of a Size Measure for Web Applications

S. Abrahão, G. Poels
{"title":"Further Analysis on the Evaluation of a Size Measure for Web Applications","authors":"S. Abrahão, G. Poels","doi":"10.1109/LA-WEB.2006.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper describes further analysis on the evaluation of OO-method function points for the Web (OOmFPWeb), a functional size measurement method for Web applications. OOmFPWeb was evaluated using a range of performance-based and perception-based variables including productivity, reproducibility, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and intention to use. The evaluation was guided by an evaluation model for information systems design methods, the method evaluation model (MEM). In this paper, we present the empirical testing of the MEM to verify the validity of this model in the evaluation of OOmFPWeb. It includes the analysis of causal relationships existing among the different variables of the model. The results show that the MEM is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating OOmFPWeb but the relationships among productivity, perceived ease of use and intention to use needs to be revised","PeriodicalId":339667,"journal":{"name":"2006 Fourth Latin American Web Congress","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2006 Fourth Latin American Web Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LA-WEB.2006.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This paper describes further analysis on the evaluation of OO-method function points for the Web (OOmFPWeb), a functional size measurement method for Web applications. OOmFPWeb was evaluated using a range of performance-based and perception-based variables including productivity, reproducibility, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and intention to use. The evaluation was guided by an evaluation model for information systems design methods, the method evaluation model (MEM). In this paper, we present the empirical testing of the MEM to verify the validity of this model in the evaluation of OOmFPWeb. It includes the analysis of causal relationships existing among the different variables of the model. The results show that the MEM is a reliable and valid instrument for evaluating OOmFPWeb but the relationships among productivity, perceived ease of use and intention to use needs to be revised
Web应用程序大小度量评估的进一步分析
本文进一步分析了Web应用程序功能大小度量方法oo方法Web功能点(OOmFPWeb)的评价。OOmFPWeb使用一系列基于性能和基于感知的变量进行评估,包括生产率、可重复性、感知易用性、感知有用性和使用意图。评价以信息系统设计方法评价模型——方法评价模型(MEM)为指导。在本文中,我们提出了MEM的实证检验,以验证该模型在评价OOmFPWeb中的有效性。它包括对模型中不同变量之间存在的因果关系的分析。结果表明,MEM是一种可靠、有效的评价工具,但生产率、感知易用性和使用意图之间的关系有待修订
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信