Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Safety Status in a Medical Centre: Experience from Implementing Standard Safety System

Javad Vatani, S. Yousefzadeh, Shiva Mohammadjani Kumeleh, F. Mehrabian, A. Davoudi-kiakalayeh
{"title":"Quantitative and Qualitative Assessment of Safety Status in a Medical Centre: Experience from Implementing Standard Safety System","authors":"Javad Vatani, S. Yousefzadeh, Shiva Mohammadjani Kumeleh, F. Mehrabian, A. Davoudi-kiakalayeh","doi":"10.32598/cjhr.7.3.195.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: An accident is an unforeseen occurrence that happens in all organs, including medical centers, due to unsafe conditions and practices which cause damage and sometimes irreparable injuries. Establishing safety system in the medical center seek to prevent harm to both patients and health care professionals. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess safety status in a medical center before and after implementing standard safety system. Materials & Methods: This case-study was carried out among the staff of a hospital in Guilan province, Iran in 2018-2019. The information was collected through observation and interview with staff and checking the observance of instructions and safety tips. Then, the possibility of needle stick injury was identified by calculating accident indices. human errors were assessed using risk assessment using Systematic human error reduction and prediction approach (SHERPA). Results: A total of 9 departments of a selected hospital were studied and the accident and human errors were identified. The recurrence rate of the accident in 2019 compared to 2018 had a decreasing rate from 11.36 to 4.09 (safe_T_score=-3.14). Risk assessment using SHERPA method in the gynecology ward revealed 4 important types of errors in this department. Conclusion: There was considerable reduction in frequency and severity of needle stick injuries after establishment of safety system in the hospital. The SHERPA method, detailed the task errors and specific remedial measure to correct the task. The results of this study can be helpful for medical staff, managers, employers, and safety experts in identifying and preventing the causes of the accident.","PeriodicalId":112656,"journal":{"name":"Caspian Journal of Health Research","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Caspian Journal of Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32598/cjhr.7.3.195.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: An accident is an unforeseen occurrence that happens in all organs, including medical centers, due to unsafe conditions and practices which cause damage and sometimes irreparable injuries. Establishing safety system in the medical center seek to prevent harm to both patients and health care professionals. Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess safety status in a medical center before and after implementing standard safety system. Materials & Methods: This case-study was carried out among the staff of a hospital in Guilan province, Iran in 2018-2019. The information was collected through observation and interview with staff and checking the observance of instructions and safety tips. Then, the possibility of needle stick injury was identified by calculating accident indices. human errors were assessed using risk assessment using Systematic human error reduction and prediction approach (SHERPA). Results: A total of 9 departments of a selected hospital were studied and the accident and human errors were identified. The recurrence rate of the accident in 2019 compared to 2018 had a decreasing rate from 11.36 to 4.09 (safe_T_score=-3.14). Risk assessment using SHERPA method in the gynecology ward revealed 4 important types of errors in this department. Conclusion: There was considerable reduction in frequency and severity of needle stick injuries after establishment of safety system in the hospital. The SHERPA method, detailed the task errors and specific remedial measure to correct the task. The results of this study can be helpful for medical staff, managers, employers, and safety experts in identifying and preventing the causes of the accident.
医疗中心安全状况的定量与定性评估:实施标准安全体系的经验
背景:事故是发生在包括医疗中心在内的所有器官的不可预见的事件,由于不安全的条件和做法而造成损害,有时甚至是不可挽回的伤害。在医疗中心建立安全体系,以防止对患者和医护人员的伤害。目的:本研究旨在评估某医疗中心实施标准安全制度前后的安全状况。材料与方法:本案例研究于2018-2019年在伊朗桂兰省某医院的工作人员中进行。这些资料是通过观察和与员工面谈,以及检查员工是否遵守指示和安全提示收集的。然后,通过计算事故指数,确定针刺伤的可能性。采用系统人为错误减少和预测方法(SHERPA)进行风险评估。结果:选取某医院9个科室进行调查,确定了事故和人为失误。与2018年相比,2019年的事故复发率从11.36下降到4.09 (safe_T_score=-3.14)。利用SHERPA法对妇科病房进行风险评估,发现该科室存在4种重要的错误类型。结论:医院建立安全制度后,针刺伤的发生频率和严重程度均有明显降低。SHERPA方法,详细说明了任务的错误和具体的补救措施,以纠正任务。本研究的结果可为医护人员、管理人员、雇主及安全专家识别及预防事故原因提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信