Let’s Talk: Face-to-Face Interaction Now

J. Reades, M. Crookston
{"title":"Let’s Talk: Face-to-Face Interaction Now","authors":"J. Reades, M. Crookston","doi":"10.1332/policypress/9781529215991.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We look at how Chapter 5’s ‘people ideas’ play out in practice; it is about real people talking about real jobs. Respondents described their interactions, how much was internal or external, the frequency and nature of contacts, and how much their social and work lives interpenetrated. Strongly evident in the responses is the role of different technologies in displacing face-to-face in specific contexts and settings. The trade-offs between on- and off-line encounters emerged, as did what that means for how firms conduct business and choose where to locate. A section titled Was This the Future? reports on a follow-up survey of our original interviewees in the midst of a global pandemic that tested our assumptions and arguments. With lockdowns, ‘social distancing’ and working from home as people’s ‘new normal’, was this the moment to discover that F2F wasn’t quite so important after all? The section reports both on immediate effects in their sectors, and their views on the likely longer-term impacts on how business would be done.","PeriodicalId":444977,"journal":{"name":"Why Face-to-Face Still Matters","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Why Face-to-Face Still Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529215991.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We look at how Chapter 5’s ‘people ideas’ play out in practice; it is about real people talking about real jobs. Respondents described their interactions, how much was internal or external, the frequency and nature of contacts, and how much their social and work lives interpenetrated. Strongly evident in the responses is the role of different technologies in displacing face-to-face in specific contexts and settings. The trade-offs between on- and off-line encounters emerged, as did what that means for how firms conduct business and choose where to locate. A section titled Was This the Future? reports on a follow-up survey of our original interviewees in the midst of a global pandemic that tested our assumptions and arguments. With lockdowns, ‘social distancing’ and working from home as people’s ‘new normal’, was this the moment to discover that F2F wasn’t quite so important after all? The section reports both on immediate effects in their sectors, and their views on the likely longer-term impacts on how business would be done.
让我们谈谈:面对面的互动
我们来看看第五章的“人的观念”是如何在实践中发挥作用的;它是关于真实的人谈论真实的工作。受访者描述了他们的互动,有多少是内部或外部的,接触的频率和性质,以及他们的社会和工作生活相互渗透的程度。在这些回应中,非常明显的是,在特定的环境和环境中,不同的技术在取代面对面的作用。线上和线下接触之间的权衡出现了,这对公司如何开展业务和选择地点意味着什么。这是未来吗?在全球大流行期间对我们最初的受访者进行的后续调查报告,检验了我们的假设和论点。随着封锁、“保持社交距离”和在家工作成为人们的“新常态”,现在是不是应该发现F2F并不那么重要了?该部分既报告了对各自行业的直接影响,也报告了他们对如何开展业务可能产生的长期影响的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信