Rethinking Lintner: An Alternative Dynamic Model of Dividends

Larry Bauer, Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya
{"title":"Rethinking Lintner: An Alternative Dynamic Model of Dividends","authors":"Larry Bauer, Nalinaksha Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1361725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical modeling of dividends has been dominated by Lintner (1956). However, Lintner's model suffers from the logical paradox that if companies have target payout ratios then in the steady state the companies will have reached those target payout ratios. Moreover as demon-strated by Bond and Mougoue (1991) Lintner's model is also poorly specified when earnings are serially correlated. This twin shortfall of Lintner's model motivated us to explore the possibility of an alternative dynamic empirical model of dividends. We test our model by cross sectional Tobit regression as well as by time series fitting. We find that the results of the Tobit regression are consistent with the predictions of our model. In time series testing, we find that one of our models fits the empirical reality at least 75% of the time. For firms with longer data series of 35 years or more, our model describes the empirical data succinctly in 96% of the cases.","PeriodicalId":437258,"journal":{"name":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corporate Finance: Capital Structure & Payout Policies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1361725","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Empirical modeling of dividends has been dominated by Lintner (1956). However, Lintner's model suffers from the logical paradox that if companies have target payout ratios then in the steady state the companies will have reached those target payout ratios. Moreover as demon-strated by Bond and Mougoue (1991) Lintner's model is also poorly specified when earnings are serially correlated. This twin shortfall of Lintner's model motivated us to explore the possibility of an alternative dynamic empirical model of dividends. We test our model by cross sectional Tobit regression as well as by time series fitting. We find that the results of the Tobit regression are consistent with the predictions of our model. In time series testing, we find that one of our models fits the empirical reality at least 75% of the time. For firms with longer data series of 35 years or more, our model describes the empirical data succinctly in 96% of the cases.
重新思考林特纳:股息的另一种动态模型
股利的实证模型由Lintner(1956)主导。然而,林特纳的模型存在一个逻辑悖论,即如果公司有目标派息率,那么在稳定状态下,公司将达到这些目标派息率。此外,正如Bond和mougue(1991)所证明的那样,Lintner的模型在收益序列相关时也没有明确规定。林特纳模型的双重缺陷促使我们探索另一种动态股利实证模型的可能性。我们通过横截面Tobit回归和时间序列拟合来检验我们的模型。我们发现Tobit回归的结果与我们模型的预测是一致的。在时间序列测试中,我们发现我们的一个模型至少有75%的时间符合经验现实。对于拥有35年或更长的数据序列的公司,我们的模型在96%的情况下简洁地描述了经验数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信