Managing Inter-State Border Disputes: Experience from the Malawi-Tanzania Border Wrangle

James Zotto
{"title":"Managing Inter-State Border Disputes: Experience from the Malawi-Tanzania Border Wrangle","authors":"James Zotto","doi":"10.56279/tza20211014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For decades, Malawi has been in a border dispute with Tanzania. Efforts to manage the dispute have been made. This paper highlights the border dispute management initiatives taken by Malawi and Tanzania. Specifically, it examines the reasons why the management of the dispute has not been successful. The paper begins by clarifying certain conceptual issues. It then describes the management of border disputes in Africa in order to establish how the disputes have been managed on the continent as a whole. This helps to establish the success or failure of the border dispute management initiatives on the continent. Then, the paper examines the management of the border dispute involving Nyasaland and Tanganyika during the colonial period, specifically during the late British colonial period. Finally, it analyses the border dispute management initiatives taken by Malawi and Tanzania during the post-colonial period. Data for this paper are drawn from multiple sources, including documentary information and oral interviews. The argument is that the colonial governments of Nyasaland and Tanganyika and, later, the post-colonial governments of Malawi and Tanzania, attempted to manage the border dispute under consideration but in vain because of the various socio-economic and political circumstances that influenced the process which consequently retarded the efforts to manage the dispute. In this regard, the paper has found that the colonising power did not put considerable effort in managing the dispute because it was not their priority and because it did not affect them in any way. The early post-colonial governments of Malawi and Tanzania did not make a great effort to manage the dispute either, since they were preoccupied with other pressing issues such as building their national economies and repositioning themselves in the new, post-colonial context.","PeriodicalId":134808,"journal":{"name":"Tanzania Zamani: A Journal of Historical Research and Writing","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tanzania Zamani: A Journal of Historical Research and Writing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56279/tza20211014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For decades, Malawi has been in a border dispute with Tanzania. Efforts to manage the dispute have been made. This paper highlights the border dispute management initiatives taken by Malawi and Tanzania. Specifically, it examines the reasons why the management of the dispute has not been successful. The paper begins by clarifying certain conceptual issues. It then describes the management of border disputes in Africa in order to establish how the disputes have been managed on the continent as a whole. This helps to establish the success or failure of the border dispute management initiatives on the continent. Then, the paper examines the management of the border dispute involving Nyasaland and Tanganyika during the colonial period, specifically during the late British colonial period. Finally, it analyses the border dispute management initiatives taken by Malawi and Tanzania during the post-colonial period. Data for this paper are drawn from multiple sources, including documentary information and oral interviews. The argument is that the colonial governments of Nyasaland and Tanganyika and, later, the post-colonial governments of Malawi and Tanzania, attempted to manage the border dispute under consideration but in vain because of the various socio-economic and political circumstances that influenced the process which consequently retarded the efforts to manage the dispute. In this regard, the paper has found that the colonising power did not put considerable effort in managing the dispute because it was not their priority and because it did not affect them in any way. The early post-colonial governments of Malawi and Tanzania did not make a great effort to manage the dispute either, since they were preoccupied with other pressing issues such as building their national economies and repositioning themselves in the new, post-colonial context.
管理国家间边界争端:来自马拉维-坦桑尼亚边界争端的经验
几十年来,马拉维一直与坦桑尼亚存在边界争端。已经做出了努力来解决争端。本文重点介绍了马拉维和坦桑尼亚采取的边界争端管理举措。具体地说,它审查了对争端的管理没有成功的原因。本文首先澄清了某些概念性问题。然后,它描述了非洲边界争端的管理,以确定如何在整个大陆上管理争端。这有助于确定非洲大陆边界争端管理倡议的成败。然后,本文考察了在殖民时期,特别是在英国殖民时期后期,涉及尼亚萨兰和坦噶尼喀边境争端的管理。最后,分析了马拉维和坦桑尼亚在后殖民时期采取的边界争端管理举措。本文的数据来自多个来源,包括文献资料和口头采访。论点是尼亚萨兰和坦噶尼喀的殖民政府,以及后来的马拉维和坦桑尼亚的后殖民政府都试图处理正在审议的边界争端,但由于各种社会经济和政治环境影响了这一进程,从而阻碍了处理争端的努力,因此都是徒劳的。在这方面,本文发现,殖民大国没有在处理争端方面作出相当大的努力,因为这不是它们的优先事项,也因为这对它们没有任何影响。早期的后殖民时期的马拉维和坦桑尼亚政府也没有做出很大的努力来处理这一争端,因为他们忙于其他紧迫的问题,如建设本国经济和在新的后殖民时期重新定位自己。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信