Improving Collaborative Filtering’s Rating Prediction Accuracy by Introducing the Common Item Rating Past Criterion

Dionisis Margaris, Dionysios Vasilopoulos, C. Vassilakis, D. Spiliotopoulos
{"title":"Improving Collaborative Filtering’s Rating Prediction Accuracy by Introducing the Common Item Rating Past Criterion","authors":"Dionisis Margaris, Dionysios Vasilopoulos, C. Vassilakis, D. Spiliotopoulos","doi":"10.1109/IISA.2019.8900758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collaborative filtering formulates personalized recommendations by considering ratings submitted by users. Collaborative filtering algorithms initially find people having similar likings, by inspecting the similarity of ratings already present in the ratings database. Users exhibiting high similarity regarding their likings are classified as “near neighbors” (NNs) and the ratings entered by each user’s near neighbors drive the formulation of recommendations for that user. To quantify the similarity between users, in order to determine a user’s NNs, a similarity metric is used. Insofar, similarity metrics proposed in the literature either consider all user ratings equally or take into account temporal variations within the users’ or items’ ratings history. However users’ ratings are co-shaped according to the experiences that they had in the past; therefore if two users enter similar (or dissimilar) ratings for an item while having experienced to a large extent the same items in the past, this constitutes stronger evidence about user similarity (or dissimilarity). Insofar however, no similarity metric takes into account this aspect. In this work, we propose and evaluate an algorithm that considers the common item rating past when computing rating predictions, in order to increase rating prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":371385,"journal":{"name":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2019.8900758","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Collaborative filtering formulates personalized recommendations by considering ratings submitted by users. Collaborative filtering algorithms initially find people having similar likings, by inspecting the similarity of ratings already present in the ratings database. Users exhibiting high similarity regarding their likings are classified as “near neighbors” (NNs) and the ratings entered by each user’s near neighbors drive the formulation of recommendations for that user. To quantify the similarity between users, in order to determine a user’s NNs, a similarity metric is used. Insofar, similarity metrics proposed in the literature either consider all user ratings equally or take into account temporal variations within the users’ or items’ ratings history. However users’ ratings are co-shaped according to the experiences that they had in the past; therefore if two users enter similar (or dissimilar) ratings for an item while having experienced to a large extent the same items in the past, this constitutes stronger evidence about user similarity (or dissimilarity). Insofar however, no similarity metric takes into account this aspect. In this work, we propose and evaluate an algorithm that considers the common item rating past when computing rating predictions, in order to increase rating prediction accuracy.
引入公共项目评定过去标准提高协同过滤评定预测精度
协同过滤通过考虑用户提交的评分来制定个性化推荐。协同过滤算法首先通过检查评分数据库中已经存在的评分的相似性来找到具有相似喜好的人。在喜好方面表现出高相似性的用户被归类为“近邻”(nn),每个用户的近邻输入的评级驱动了对该用户的推荐的制定。为了量化用户之间的相似性,为了确定用户的神经网络,使用了相似性度量。到目前为止,文献中提出的相似性度量要么平等地考虑所有用户评级,要么考虑用户或项目评级历史中的时间变化。然而,用户的评分是根据他们过去的体验共同塑造的;因此,如果两个用户输入相似(或不同)的评分,而他们在很大程度上经历过相同的物品,这就构成了关于用户相似性(或不相似性)的更有力的证据。然而,到目前为止,没有相似度度量考虑到这方面。在这项工作中,我们提出并评估了一种在计算评级预测时考虑过去常见项目评级的算法,以提高评级预测的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信