The algocracy as a new ideal type for government organizations: Predictive policing in Berlin as an empirical case

Inf. Polity Pub Date : 2021-02-22 DOI:10.3233/ip-200279
L. Lorenz, A. Meijer, Tino Schuppan
{"title":"The algocracy as a new ideal type for government organizations: Predictive policing in Berlin as an empirical case","authors":"L. Lorenz, A. Meijer, Tino Schuppan","doi":"10.3233/ip-200279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Motivated by the classic work of Max Weber, this study develops an ideal type to study the transformation of government bureaucracy in the ‘age of algorithms’. We present the new ideal type – the algocracy – and position this vis-à-vis three other ideal types (machine bureaucracy, professional bureaucracy, infocracy). We show that while the infocracy uses technology to improve the machine bureaucracy, the algocracy automates the professional bureaucracy. By reducing and quantifying the uncertainty of decision-making processes in organizations the algocracy rationalizes the exercise of rational-legal authority in the professional bureaucracy. To test the value of the ideal type, we use it to analyze the introduction of a predictive policing system in the Berlin police. Our empirical analysis confirms the value of the algocracy as a lens to study empirical practices: the study highlights how the KrimPro system conditions professional assessments and centralizes control over complex police processes. This research therefore positions the algocracy in the heart of discussions about the future of the public sector and presents an agenda for further research.","PeriodicalId":418875,"journal":{"name":"Inf. Polity","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inf. Polity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/ip-200279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Motivated by the classic work of Max Weber, this study develops an ideal type to study the transformation of government bureaucracy in the ‘age of algorithms’. We present the new ideal type – the algocracy – and position this vis-à-vis three other ideal types (machine bureaucracy, professional bureaucracy, infocracy). We show that while the infocracy uses technology to improve the machine bureaucracy, the algocracy automates the professional bureaucracy. By reducing and quantifying the uncertainty of decision-making processes in organizations the algocracy rationalizes the exercise of rational-legal authority in the professional bureaucracy. To test the value of the ideal type, we use it to analyze the introduction of a predictive policing system in the Berlin police. Our empirical analysis confirms the value of the algocracy as a lens to study empirical practices: the study highlights how the KrimPro system conditions professional assessments and centralizes control over complex police processes. This research therefore positions the algocracy in the heart of discussions about the future of the public sector and presents an agenda for further research.
作为政府组织新理想类型的寡头政治:柏林预测性警务的实证案例
在韦伯经典著作的激励下,本研究发展了一个理想的类型来研究“算法时代”的政府官僚转型。我们提出了新的理想类型-算法官僚-并将其与-à-vis其他三种理想类型(机器官僚,专业官僚,信息官僚)进行比较。我们表明,当信息官僚主义使用技术来改进机器官僚主义时,算法官僚主义使专业官僚主义自动化。通过减少和量化组织中决策过程的不确定性,算法官僚使专业官僚中理性-法律权威的行使合理化。为了检验理想类型的价值,我们用它来分析柏林警方引入预测性警务系统的情况。我们的实证分析证实了算法政治作为研究实证实践的一个镜头的价值:该研究强调了KrimPro系统如何对专业评估进行条件调节,并对复杂的警察流程进行集中控制。因此,本研究将算法政治置于有关公共部门未来讨论的核心位置,并提出了进一步研究的议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信