The comparative performance of Islamic and conventional banks: a meta-analysis

H. A. Wahab, Mohammed Nur Irfan Mohammed Roslan
{"title":"The comparative performance of Islamic and conventional banks: a meta-analysis","authors":"H. A. Wahab, Mohammed Nur Irfan Mohammed Roslan","doi":"10.1504/MEJM.2021.10036652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To date, several studies have been devoted to comparatively examine the performance of Islamic banks to its conventional counterparts with mixed results. Given these inconclusive findings, the purpose of the study is to systematically review 73 samples of past journals and published thesis related to the performance of Islamic and conventional banks subject to regional and period of study. The results reported from past studies are systematically analysed using meta-analysis approach to effectively estimate the size of effect of the implementation of Islamic banking system to the overall performance of Islamic banks relative to conventional banks. Based on meta-analysis, in overall, there is no significant difference of performance between Islamic and conventional banks. In term of regional aspect, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Malaysia showcase better performance of Islamic banks in comparison to conventional banks. Further, Islamic banks perform better during short-term period while long-term studies show the domination of conventional banks. From policy implication, this study suggests that Islamic banks can perform better than its counterparts in a region that has strong government initiatives and community awareness in Islamic finance.","PeriodicalId":123919,"journal":{"name":"Middle East J. of Management","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East J. of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/MEJM.2021.10036652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To date, several studies have been devoted to comparatively examine the performance of Islamic banks to its conventional counterparts with mixed results. Given these inconclusive findings, the purpose of the study is to systematically review 73 samples of past journals and published thesis related to the performance of Islamic and conventional banks subject to regional and period of study. The results reported from past studies are systematically analysed using meta-analysis approach to effectively estimate the size of effect of the implementation of Islamic banking system to the overall performance of Islamic banks relative to conventional banks. Based on meta-analysis, in overall, there is no significant difference of performance between Islamic and conventional banks. In term of regional aspect, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Malaysia showcase better performance of Islamic banks in comparison to conventional banks. Further, Islamic banks perform better during short-term period while long-term studies show the domination of conventional banks. From policy implication, this study suggests that Islamic banks can perform better than its counterparts in a region that has strong government initiatives and community awareness in Islamic finance.
伊斯兰银行与传统银行的比较绩效:一项元分析
迄今为止,已有几项研究致力于比较伊斯兰银行与传统银行的表现,结果好坏参半。鉴于这些不确定的发现,本研究的目的是系统地审查73份过去的期刊和发表的论文样本,这些样本与伊斯兰银行和传统银行的业绩有关,受区域和研究时期的影响。从过去的研究报告的结果进行了系统的分析,使用元分析方法有效地估计实施伊斯兰银行体系对伊斯兰银行相对于传统银行的整体绩效的影响大小。基于meta分析,总体而言,伊斯兰银行与传统银行之间的绩效没有显著差异。就地区而言,巴基斯坦、孟加拉国和马来西亚的伊斯兰银行表现优于传统银行。此外,伊斯兰银行在短期内表现更好,而长期研究显示传统银行占主导地位。从政策意义上看,本研究表明,在政府倡议和社区对伊斯兰金融的认识强烈的地区,伊斯兰银行可以比其同行表现得更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信