Sugarcane variety identification using Dynamic Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Similarity

A. H. Utomo, R. Sarno, R. V. Ginardi
{"title":"Sugarcane variety identification using Dynamic Weighted Directed Acyclic Graph Similarity","authors":"A. H. Utomo, R. Sarno, R. V. Ginardi","doi":"10.1109/ICTS.2016.7910303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dynamic wDAG Similarity algorithm can be applied to sugarcane annotation. At first, we have to make a wDAG structure of many different varieties of sugarcane. We also have to make wDAG of sugarcane that will be annotated. Then, we have to calculate the similarity between wDAG types of sugarcane that will be annotated and wDAG of all the existing types of sugarcane. This similarity calculation results will present sequence similarities ranging from the most similar to the most distant from sugarcane varieties were annotated. This Dynamic wDAG Similarity algorithm has difference compared with the previous wDAG Similarity algorithm. WDAG used in this research has the node labeled, arc labeled and arc weighted, where the weight of the arc can be changed dynamically. This research fixes the previous studies of static wDAG, in which the weight values on the arc of wDAG can not be changed. On Dynamic wDAG, the weight on each arc is based on the fuzzy calculations that show the tendency of sugarcane varieties were annotated. And the fuzzy value is calculated based on agronomic traits of sugarcane to be annotated. Leaf node is the part of wDAG that will be compared first. The similarity calculation result between the two wDAG is affected by data on a leaf node to be compared and the weights of the arcs. The result shows that this method gained the average of Precision of 96%, the average of Recall of 88.5%, and the average of Accuracy of 96%.","PeriodicalId":177275,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and Systems (ICTS)","volume":"530 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Conference on Information & Communication Technology and Systems (ICTS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTS.2016.7910303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Dynamic wDAG Similarity algorithm can be applied to sugarcane annotation. At first, we have to make a wDAG structure of many different varieties of sugarcane. We also have to make wDAG of sugarcane that will be annotated. Then, we have to calculate the similarity between wDAG types of sugarcane that will be annotated and wDAG of all the existing types of sugarcane. This similarity calculation results will present sequence similarities ranging from the most similar to the most distant from sugarcane varieties were annotated. This Dynamic wDAG Similarity algorithm has difference compared with the previous wDAG Similarity algorithm. WDAG used in this research has the node labeled, arc labeled and arc weighted, where the weight of the arc can be changed dynamically. This research fixes the previous studies of static wDAG, in which the weight values on the arc of wDAG can not be changed. On Dynamic wDAG, the weight on each arc is based on the fuzzy calculations that show the tendency of sugarcane varieties were annotated. And the fuzzy value is calculated based on agronomic traits of sugarcane to be annotated. Leaf node is the part of wDAG that will be compared first. The similarity calculation result between the two wDAG is affected by data on a leaf node to be compared and the weights of the arcs. The result shows that this method gained the average of Precision of 96%, the average of Recall of 88.5%, and the average of Accuracy of 96%.
基于动态加权有向无环图相似度的甘蔗品种识别
动态wDAG相似度算法可以应用于甘蔗标注。首先,我们要把许多不同品种的甘蔗做成一个wDAG结构。我们还需要制作甘蔗的wDAG,并进行注释。然后,我们需要计算将要标注的甘蔗的wDAG类型与所有现有甘蔗类型的wDAG的相似度。这种相似性计算结果将呈现序列相似性,从最相似的到距离最远的甘蔗品种被标注。这种动态wDAG相似度算法与以往的wDAG相似度算法相比有很大的不同。本研究使用的WDAG具有节点标记、弧标记和弧加权,其中弧的权值可以动态改变。本研究修正了以往静态wDAG研究中wDAG弧线上的权值不能改变的问题。在动态wDAG上,每个弧线上的权重是基于模糊计算的,表明甘蔗品种的趋势被注释。并根据待标注甘蔗的农艺性状计算模糊值。叶子节点是wDAG中首先比较的部分。两个wDAG之间的相似性计算结果受待比较叶节点上的数据和弧的权值的影响。结果表明,该方法的平均查准率为96%,平均查全率为88.5%,平均查准率为96%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信