How to Evaluate an Evaluation Study? Comparing and Contrasting Practices in Vis with Those of Other Disciplines : Position Paper

Anamaria Crisan, Madison Elliott
{"title":"How to Evaluate an Evaluation Study? Comparing and Contrasting Practices in Vis with Those of Other Disciplines : Position Paper","authors":"Anamaria Crisan, Madison Elliott","doi":"10.1109/BELIV.2018.8634420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluative practices within vis research are not routinely compared to those of psychology, sociology, or other areas of empirical study, leaving vis vulnerable to the replicability crisis that has embroiled scientific research more generally. In this position paper, we compare contemporary vis evaluative practices against those in those other disciplines, and make concrete recommendations as to how vis evaluative practice can be improved through the use of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods. We summarize our discussion and recommendations as a checklist, that we intend to be used a resource for vis researchers conducting evaluative studies, and for reviewers evaluating the merits of such studies.","PeriodicalId":269472,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV)","volume":"199 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Evaluation and Beyond - Methodological Approaches for Visualization (BELIV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/BELIV.2018.8634420","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Evaluative practices within vis research are not routinely compared to those of psychology, sociology, or other areas of empirical study, leaving vis vulnerable to the replicability crisis that has embroiled scientific research more generally. In this position paper, we compare contemporary vis evaluative practices against those in those other disciplines, and make concrete recommendations as to how vis evaluative practice can be improved through the use of quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods. We summarize our discussion and recommendations as a checklist, that we intend to be used a resource for vis researchers conducting evaluative studies, and for reviewers evaluating the merits of such studies.
如何评估评估研究?Vis与其他学科实践的比较与对比:立场文件
vis研究中的评估实践通常不会与心理学、社会学或其他实证研究领域的评估实践进行比较,这使得vis容易受到可复制性危机的影响,而这种危机已经更普遍地卷入了科学研究。在这篇立场文件中,我们将当代视觉评估实践与其他学科的实践进行了比较,并就如何通过使用定量、定性和混合研究方法来改进视觉评估实践提出了具体建议。我们将我们的讨论和建议总结为一份清单,我们打算将其作为进行评估性研究的研究人员和评估此类研究优点的评论者的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信