Homeopathic medicine activity on the growth of Gram-negative bacteria

A. S. Marquez, T. Passeti, S. Diniz, Everton Tadeu Prado
{"title":"Homeopathic medicine activity on the growth of Gram-negative bacteria","authors":"A. S. Marquez, T. Passeti, S. Diniz, Everton Tadeu Prado","doi":"10.51910/ijhdr.v21i1.1178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Homeopathy is a therapy that uses medications prepared with infinitesimal and dynamized dilutions. Current studies demonstrate in vitro activity of homeopathy on gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Among bacterial infections, urinary tract infection (UTI) is frequent, leads to later consequences and the main causal agent is Escherichia coli (E. coli). In other publications, it has been reported inactivity of homeopathy on E. coli cultures. Due to the divergence in the literature, the objective of this study was to evaluate gram-negative bacteria growth under homeopathy treatment. Methods: The medicines Atropa belladona, Cantharis, Staphysagria, and Colibacillinum were tested at 6CH, 12CH and 30CH in E. coli ATCC 25922 and EPEC (Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli) ATCC 43887. Two hundred and fifty microliters of the medicines in alcohol 30% were incubated at 37ºC with 3 mL of Müller Hinton broth (MH), 10 μL of cultures at 0.5 Macfarland and subsequent dilution at 1/10. Bacterial growth was evaluated in a spectrophotometer at 600nm, in the periods of 6, 12, and 20 hours of incubation. Results and Discussion: The results showed no inhibition of bacterial growth under the studied conditions. These data corroborate with studies already published that indicate the absence of action of homeopathy on E. coli cultures. Considering other studies, it can be suggested that homeopathic medicines have direct activity on the growth of Gram-positive and not Gram-negative bacteria. Evaluating the two bacterial groups, it is possible to assume that the difference in homeopathy activity could be linked to differences in the bacterial wall structure. This hypothesis should be evaluated by other tests with the same bacterial strains. Conclusion: The homeopathic medicines tested have no direct activity on Gram-negative bacteria cultures.","PeriodicalId":106057,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of High Dilution Research - ISSN 1982-6206","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51910/ijhdr.v21i1.1178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Homeopathy is a therapy that uses medications prepared with infinitesimal and dynamized dilutions. Current studies demonstrate in vitro activity of homeopathy on gram-positive bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes. Among bacterial infections, urinary tract infection (UTI) is frequent, leads to later consequences and the main causal agent is Escherichia coli (E. coli). In other publications, it has been reported inactivity of homeopathy on E. coli cultures. Due to the divergence in the literature, the objective of this study was to evaluate gram-negative bacteria growth under homeopathy treatment. Methods: The medicines Atropa belladona, Cantharis, Staphysagria, and Colibacillinum were tested at 6CH, 12CH and 30CH in E. coli ATCC 25922 and EPEC (Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli) ATCC 43887. Two hundred and fifty microliters of the medicines in alcohol 30% were incubated at 37ºC with 3 mL of Müller Hinton broth (MH), 10 μL of cultures at 0.5 Macfarland and subsequent dilution at 1/10. Bacterial growth was evaluated in a spectrophotometer at 600nm, in the periods of 6, 12, and 20 hours of incubation. Results and Discussion: The results showed no inhibition of bacterial growth under the studied conditions. These data corroborate with studies already published that indicate the absence of action of homeopathy on E. coli cultures. Considering other studies, it can be suggested that homeopathic medicines have direct activity on the growth of Gram-positive and not Gram-negative bacteria. Evaluating the two bacterial groups, it is possible to assume that the difference in homeopathy activity could be linked to differences in the bacterial wall structure. This hypothesis should be evaluated by other tests with the same bacterial strains. Conclusion: The homeopathic medicines tested have no direct activity on Gram-negative bacteria cultures.
顺势疗法药物对革兰氏阴性菌生长的影响
简介:顺势疗法是一种使用用无限小的和动态稀释的药物制备的疗法。目前的研究表明,顺势疗法对革兰氏阳性细菌如金黄色葡萄球菌和化脓性链球菌的体外活性。在细菌感染中,尿路感染(UTI)是常见的,导致较晚的后果,主要病原体是大肠杆菌(E. coli)。在其他出版物中,有报道称顺势疗法对大肠杆菌培养不起作用。由于文献的分歧,本研究的目的是评估革兰氏阴性菌在顺势疗法治疗下的生长情况。方法:采用大肠杆菌ATCC 25922和肠致病性大肠杆菌ATCC 43887分别检测茄空曲草、Cantharis、葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的6CH、12CH和30CH。取250微升药物,酒精浓度30%,与3ml 勒辛顿肉汤(MH), 10 μL培养物,0.5麦克法兰,1/10稀释,37℃孵育。在600nm的分光光度计下,在6、12和20小时的孵育期间评估细菌的生长情况。结果与讨论:在实验条件下,对细菌生长无抑制作用。这些数据证实了已经发表的研究表明顺势疗法对大肠杆菌培养物没有作用。考虑到其他研究,可以认为顺势疗法药物对革兰氏阳性细菌的生长有直接作用,而不是革兰氏阴性细菌的生长。评估这两组细菌,可以假设顺势疗法活性的差异可能与细菌壁结构的差异有关。这一假设应通过使用相同菌株的其他试验来评估。结论:顺势疗法药物对革兰氏阴性菌培养无直接作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信