Minimally Invasive Pain Procedures

M. F. Harandi
{"title":"Minimally Invasive Pain Procedures","authors":"M. F. Harandi","doi":"10.17795/MINSURGERY-39016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Preserving normal tissue during surgery has become increasingly important for better outcome after operation. Because of this, minimally invasive procedures have been developed. There are many pain procedures with minimally invasive method to aid fluoroscopy. The percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty instead of screw fixation for many kinds of compressed fractures with 90% success rate is a good example (1). The percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of medial branch of dorsal ramus for facet mediated vertebral pains is another example with good results (2). The percutaneous trigeminal ganglion radiofrequency ablation instead of microvascular decompression in elderly people has success rate of 80% 90% (3). Spinal column stimulator and intrathecal pump implantation are expensive and useful methods of treating persistent pains such as failed back surgery syndrome and CRPS (4). Recently, the percutaneous transformational decompression of disc with ozone or laser or coblation in bulging or moderate protrusion of lumbar or cervical discs or in disco genic pain instead of discectomy or screw fixations, have become popular. In 1973, Kambin (originally Iranian orthopedic surgeon) started percutaneous decompression of disc by nucleotomy in USA (5). Later, he reported 72 percent success rate with modified Hijikata approach (6). In 1985, Onik et al. introduced nucleotomy with motorized shaver (7). Ascher performed the first laser discectomy in mid-1980s. He used Nd: YAG laser and the good to fair range response to that method was 78% (8). Minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy was initiated by Kambin in 1988. Kambin described The triangular safe zone in transforaminal approach in 1990 (4). Tsou and Yeung, in 2002 , reported the same efficacy for endoscopic discectomy and conventional open surgery (9). They reported 91% success rate for this approach (10). Nevertheless, there are some failed cases such as migrated fragments or high canal compromised herniation (11). With recent advances, endoscopic discectomy will gradually replace open discectomy in near future.","PeriodicalId":158928,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17795/MINSURGERY-39016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Preserving normal tissue during surgery has become increasingly important for better outcome after operation. Because of this, minimally invasive procedures have been developed. There are many pain procedures with minimally invasive method to aid fluoroscopy. The percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty instead of screw fixation for many kinds of compressed fractures with 90% success rate is a good example (1). The percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of medial branch of dorsal ramus for facet mediated vertebral pains is another example with good results (2). The percutaneous trigeminal ganglion radiofrequency ablation instead of microvascular decompression in elderly people has success rate of 80% 90% (3). Spinal column stimulator and intrathecal pump implantation are expensive and useful methods of treating persistent pains such as failed back surgery syndrome and CRPS (4). Recently, the percutaneous transformational decompression of disc with ozone or laser or coblation in bulging or moderate protrusion of lumbar or cervical discs or in disco genic pain instead of discectomy or screw fixations, have become popular. In 1973, Kambin (originally Iranian orthopedic surgeon) started percutaneous decompression of disc by nucleotomy in USA (5). Later, he reported 72 percent success rate with modified Hijikata approach (6). In 1985, Onik et al. introduced nucleotomy with motorized shaver (7). Ascher performed the first laser discectomy in mid-1980s. He used Nd: YAG laser and the good to fair range response to that method was 78% (8). Minimally invasive percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy was initiated by Kambin in 1988. Kambin described The triangular safe zone in transforaminal approach in 1990 (4). Tsou and Yeung, in 2002 , reported the same efficacy for endoscopic discectomy and conventional open surgery (9). They reported 91% success rate for this approach (10). Nevertheless, there are some failed cases such as migrated fragments or high canal compromised herniation (11). With recent advances, endoscopic discectomy will gradually replace open discectomy in near future.
微创疼痛手术
在手术中保留正常组织对于术后更好的预后变得越来越重要。正因为如此,微创手术得以发展。有许多疼痛手术采用微创方法来辅助透视。经皮椎体成形术或后凸成形术代替螺钉固定治疗多种压缩性骨折的成功率为90%是一个很好的例子(1)。经皮射频消融背支内侧支治疗小关节介导的椎体疼痛是另一个效果良好的例子(2)。经皮三叉神经节射频消融代替老年人微血管减压的成功率为80% - 90% (3)泵植入术是治疗持续性疼痛如背部手术失败综合征和CRPS的昂贵而有效的方法(4)。最近,臭氧或激光经皮椎间盘转化减压或消融治疗腰椎间盘突出或中度突出或迪斯科源性疼痛,而不是椎间盘切除术或螺钉固定,已经变得流行。1973年,Kambin(原伊朗骨科医生)在美国开始采用核切开术进行经皮椎间盘减压(5)。后来,他报道了改良Hijikata入路72%的成功率(6)。1985年,Onik等人采用电动刮刀进行核切开术(7)。Ascher在20世纪80年代中期进行了第一次激光椎间盘切除术。他使用Nd: YAG激光,该方法的良好到合理范围的反应为78%(8)。微创经皮经椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术由Kambin于1988年首创。Kambin在1990年描述了经椎间孔入路中的三角形安全区(4)。Tsou和Yeung在2002年报道了内镜下椎间盘切除术与传统开放手术相同的疗效(9)。他们报道了该入路91%的成功率(10)。然而,也有一些失败的病例,如移位碎片或高位管受损疝(11)。随着近年来的进展,内镜下椎间盘切除术将在不久的将来逐渐取代开放式椎间盘切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信