[The effect of volume and dosage of isobaric bupivacaine on the sensory spread of spinal anesthesia].

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1990-09-01
A Schmidt, R Schwagmeier, E Broja, H Nolte
{"title":"[The effect of volume and dosage of isobaric bupivacaine on the sensory spread of spinal anesthesia].","authors":"A Schmidt,&nbsp;R Schwagmeier,&nbsp;E Broja,&nbsp;H Nolte","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is some controversy about the relationship of volume, concentration and total dose of bupivacaine in the sensory spread of spinal anesthesia. In this study the effects of volume and dose were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS. In this study 120 patients undergoing lower extremity, inguinal or transurethral surgery were randomly divided into six groups. Bupivacaine 15 mg with the addition of epinephrine 1:200,000 was administered in 2 ml (0.75%), 3 ml (0.5%), 6 ml (0.25%) and 9 ml (0.166%) solutions. In addition 3 ml isobaric bupivacaine in doses of 7.5 mg (0.25%), 15 mg (0.5%) and 22.5 mg (0.75%). The spinal puncture was performed via the midline approach at the L3-4 interspace, with the patient in the sitting position. The injection speed was 0.5 ml per second. Immediately after the injection the patients were placed in the supine position. The spread of sensory blockade was assessed by means of the pin-prick method in the midline. Motor blockade was assessed on the Bromage scale 0-3. RESULTS. There were no statistically significant differences in motor blockade or cardiovascular changes. The maximum cephalad spread of analgesia (30 min) between the 15 mg groups with different volumes and concentration was: group I (9 ml): T7.7, group II (6 ml): T7.8, group III (3 ml): T8.5 and group IV (2 ml): T10.1. The differences between group IV 2 ml and the groups receiving 3, 6 and 9 ml were statistically significant (P less than 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in maximum cephalad spread between the 7.5 mg (3 ml), 15 mg (3 ml) and the 22.5 mg (3 ml) groups. The regression after 180 min was significantly shorter in the 7.5 mg group than in the 15 mg and 22.5 mg groups (P less than 0.05). DISCUSSION. Earlier published results indicate that the dose of isobaric bupivacaine is more important in spinal anesthesia than the concentration or the volume of the solution. The comparison between 3 ml:6 ml and 3 ml:9 ml bupivacaine showed no statistically significant differences in cephalad spread. A volume-dependent increase in segmental spread was between the 2 ml (0.75%) and 3 ml (0.5%) bupivacaine. The same statistically significant differences were between the 2 ml and 6 ml groups and the 2 ml and 9 ml groups. No statistically significant difference in cephalad spread resulted from increasing the dose of bupivacaine from 7.5 mg to 22.5 mg. Earlier studies on the effects of changes in volume, concentration and dose of bupivacaine showed similar \"jumps of blockade\" between 2 ml and 3 ml injected volume. Assembling the results the relation between volume and total dose does not suggest a no linear dependence. The anatomic configuration of the spinal cord at the conus medullaris may affect the distribution of the solution.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"13 7","pages":"159-62"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is some controversy about the relationship of volume, concentration and total dose of bupivacaine in the sensory spread of spinal anesthesia. In this study the effects of volume and dose were investigated. MATERIAL AND METHODS. In this study 120 patients undergoing lower extremity, inguinal or transurethral surgery were randomly divided into six groups. Bupivacaine 15 mg with the addition of epinephrine 1:200,000 was administered in 2 ml (0.75%), 3 ml (0.5%), 6 ml (0.25%) and 9 ml (0.166%) solutions. In addition 3 ml isobaric bupivacaine in doses of 7.5 mg (0.25%), 15 mg (0.5%) and 22.5 mg (0.75%). The spinal puncture was performed via the midline approach at the L3-4 interspace, with the patient in the sitting position. The injection speed was 0.5 ml per second. Immediately after the injection the patients were placed in the supine position. The spread of sensory blockade was assessed by means of the pin-prick method in the midline. Motor blockade was assessed on the Bromage scale 0-3. RESULTS. There were no statistically significant differences in motor blockade or cardiovascular changes. The maximum cephalad spread of analgesia (30 min) between the 15 mg groups with different volumes and concentration was: group I (9 ml): T7.7, group II (6 ml): T7.8, group III (3 ml): T8.5 and group IV (2 ml): T10.1. The differences between group IV 2 ml and the groups receiving 3, 6 and 9 ml were statistically significant (P less than 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in maximum cephalad spread between the 7.5 mg (3 ml), 15 mg (3 ml) and the 22.5 mg (3 ml) groups. The regression after 180 min was significantly shorter in the 7.5 mg group than in the 15 mg and 22.5 mg groups (P less than 0.05). DISCUSSION. Earlier published results indicate that the dose of isobaric bupivacaine is more important in spinal anesthesia than the concentration or the volume of the solution. The comparison between 3 ml:6 ml and 3 ml:9 ml bupivacaine showed no statistically significant differences in cephalad spread. A volume-dependent increase in segmental spread was between the 2 ml (0.75%) and 3 ml (0.5%) bupivacaine. The same statistically significant differences were between the 2 ml and 6 ml groups and the 2 ml and 9 ml groups. No statistically significant difference in cephalad spread resulted from increasing the dose of bupivacaine from 7.5 mg to 22.5 mg. Earlier studies on the effects of changes in volume, concentration and dose of bupivacaine showed similar "jumps of blockade" between 2 ml and 3 ml injected volume. Assembling the results the relation between volume and total dose does not suggest a no linear dependence. The anatomic configuration of the spinal cord at the conus medullaris may affect the distribution of the solution.

等压布比卡因的体积和剂量对脊髓麻醉感觉扩散的影响。
关于布比卡因在脊髓麻醉感觉扩散中的体积、浓度和总剂量关系,目前还存在一些争议。本研究考察了体积和剂量的影响。材料和方法。本研究将120例接受下肢、腹股沟或经尿道手术的患者随机分为6组。布比卡因15 mg加肾上腺素1:20万,分别以2 ml(0.75%)、3 ml(0.5%)、6 ml(0.25%)、9 ml(0.166%)溶液给药。此外,3毫升等比重布比卡因,剂量分别为7.5毫克(0.25%)、15毫克(0.5%)和22.5毫克(0.75%)。脊柱穿刺通过L3-4间隙的中线入路进行,患者为坐位。注射速度为0.5 ml / s。注射后立即将患者置于仰卧位。中线针刺法测定感觉阻滞的扩散情况。以Bromage评分0-3分评定运动阻滞。结果。两组在运动阻断或心血管改变方面无统计学差异。不同体积浓度15mg组镇痛头侧最大扩散(30min)为:I组(9ml): T7.7, II组(6ml): T7.8, III组(3ml): T8.5, IV组(2ml): T10.1。静脉注射2 ml组与3、6、9 ml组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。在7.5 mg (3ml)、15 mg (3ml)和22.5 mg (3ml)组之间,最大头头扩散没有统计学上的显著差异。7.5 mg组180 min后的回归显著短于15 mg和22.5 mg组(P < 0.05)。讨论。早期发表的研究结果表明,在脊髓麻醉中,等压布比卡因的剂量比溶液的浓度或体积更重要。对比3ml: 6ml和3ml: 9ml布比卡因在头状传播方面无统计学差异。在2ml(0.75%)和3ml(0.5%)布比卡因剂量之间,节段性扩散呈体积依赖性增加。2 ml和6 ml组以及2 ml和9 ml组之间的差异具有统计学意义。将布比卡因的剂量从7.5 mg增加到22.5 mg,在头部扩散方面没有统计学上的显著差异。早期对布比卡因的体积、浓度和剂量变化的影响的研究显示,在2毫升和3毫升注射体积之间出现了类似的“阻断跳跃”。综合这些结果,体积和总剂量之间的关系并非没有线性关系。脊髓在髓圆锥处的解剖结构可能影响溶液的分布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信