The Standing of the Public Interest

Amitai Etzioni
{"title":"The Standing of the Public Interest","authors":"Amitai Etzioni","doi":"10.17058/rdunisc.v2i49.7896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liberal communitarians hold that a good society achieves a carefully crafted balance between individual rights and the common good. Critics argue that there is no such thing as the common good; only aggregation of personal goods. The article first defends the concept of the common good; and then shows that it is very similar to the concept of the public interest used in the law. The article then examines the ways American courts balance the public interest and the common good in three areas: free speech, public safety, and taking.","PeriodicalId":312965,"journal":{"name":"The Barry Law Review","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Barry Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17058/rdunisc.v2i49.7896","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Liberal communitarians hold that a good society achieves a carefully crafted balance between individual rights and the common good. Critics argue that there is no such thing as the common good; only aggregation of personal goods. The article first defends the concept of the common good; and then shows that it is very similar to the concept of the public interest used in the law. The article then examines the ways American courts balance the public interest and the common good in three areas: free speech, public safety, and taking.
公共利益的地位
自由社群主义者认为,一个良好的社会在个人权利和公共利益之间实现了精心设计的平衡。批评家认为,根本不存在所谓的“共同利益”;只有个人物品的集合。文章首先对公共利益的概念进行了辩护;然后表明它与法律中使用的公共利益概念非常相似。然后,本文考察了美国法院在三个方面平衡公共利益和共同利益的方式:言论自由、公共安全和征用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信